Search for: "Land v. United States"
Results 3101 - 3120
of 6,678
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Apr 2016, 12:58 pm
The British parliament joins the United States Congress, the U.S. administration, the European parliament, and the Council of Europe in declaring the Islamic State’s genocide. [read post]
20 Apr 2016, 11:33 am
United States, 235 P.3d 42 (Cal. 2010) (The statutory phrase “keep the premises safe” is an apt description of the property-based duties underlying premises liability, a liability category that does not include vehicular negligence.) [read post]
19 Apr 2016, 2:41 pm
On Tuesday, April 26, the United States Supreme Court will hear oral argument in Mathis v. [read post]
18 Apr 2016, 11:31 am
” The United States has also pledged $139 million in humanitarian aid for Yemen. [read post]
16 Apr 2016, 5:39 pm
The proposed development, named the Center at Powell Crossing, included sixty-four units of multi-family dwellings and 14,000 square feet of retail space. [read post]
15 Apr 2016, 6:44 am
Over forty years ago, it insists, the Court’s decision in United States v. [read post]
14 Apr 2016, 5:31 pm
After the equal protection and FHA disparate treatment claims were dismissed for failure to state a claim, the United States District Court for Arizona granted summary judgment to city on developers’ FHA disparate impact claim. [read post]
13 Apr 2016, 11:09 am
Florida Panthers v. [read post]
13 Apr 2016, 9:54 am
See United States v. [read post]
13 Apr 2016, 7:23 am
Department of Commerce, and the United States Forest Service (“USFS”) of the U.S. [read post]
11 Apr 2016, 7:44 am
United States Department of the Interior. [read post]
8 Apr 2016, 7:45 am
Bridge Aina Lea, LLC v State of Hawaii Land Use Commission, 2016 WL 797567 (D. [read post]
7 Apr 2016, 10:16 am
In Johnson v. [read post]
2 Apr 2016, 6:11 am
Specifically, the Church’s complaint included nine counts: four claims invoking the United States Constitution; two claims based on the federal Religious Land Use and Institutionalized Persons Act; one claim invoking the New Hampshire Constitution; and two claims based on N.H. [read post]
31 Mar 2016, 12:04 pm
Yesterday, the Supreme Court of the United States heard oral arguments in a case that tests the authority of a federal agency to effectively restrict a property owner’s land use choices without an opportunity for judicial review. [read post]
31 Mar 2016, 9:48 am
United States and United States v. [read post]
30 Mar 2016, 7:28 am
United States (D. [read post]
30 Mar 2016, 5:40 am
In response, the Defendants claimed that the State Laws were preempted by federal law, namely, the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution and the Religious Land Use and Institutionalized Persons Act (“RLUIPA”). [read post]
28 Mar 2016, 11:52 am
Facts: This case (Pierre v. [read post]
