Search for: "Line v. Line" Results 3101 - 3120 of 45,554
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Mar 2023, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
  To take one example, at the time that the Court decided the leading qualified immunity case of Harlow v. [read post]
3 Mar 2023, 5:16 am by Eugenia Lostri, Stephanie Pell
On March 2, the Biden administration released its long-awaited National Cybersecurity Strategy. [read post]
2 Mar 2023, 11:12 pm
Author User:Makaristos Licence Public Domain   Jane LambertBusiness and Property Courts of England and Wales (Mr Ian Karet) Marriott Worldwide Corporation v Delta Air Lines, Inc. [2023] EWHC 283 (Ch) (10 Feb 2023In Re DELTA, Delta Air Lines, Inc, v Marriott Worldwide Corporation O/081/22 31 Jan 2022, Marriutt Worldwide Corporation ("Marriott") successfully resisted an application by Delta Air [read post]
2 Mar 2023, 4:31 am by SHG
For example, in her forceful dissent in West Virginia v. [read post]
2 Mar 2023, 4:00 am by INFORRM
Perhaps the most irksome line in the report is: ‘There were differing opinions on whether SLAPPs were a live issue, which is concerning given the increasing level of scrutiny on this matter’. [read post]
1 Mar 2023, 9:39 am by HRWatchdog
Generally speaking, the vehicles must transport goods across state lines, or transport goods that have crossed state lines, and the vehicles must have a gross weight in excess of 10,001 pounds. [read post]
1 Mar 2023, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
However, citing Simkin v Blank, 19 NY3d 46, the Appellate Division explained that "allegations consisting of bare legal conclusions ... are not entitled to any such consideration. [read post]
1 Mar 2023, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
However, citing Simkin v Blank, 19 NY3d 46, the Appellate Division explained that "allegations consisting of bare legal conclusions ... are not entitled to any such consideration. [read post]
1 Mar 2023, 4:40 am by Michael C. Dorf
Even so, the admittedly fuzzy distinction between direct and indirect injuries gets at the limitation I'm describing, which might also be analogized to proximate cause.Some version of that idea--either the direct/indirect distinction or the notion of proximate cause--helps explain why rejecting standing for Missouri even if it stands in the shoes of MOHELA is consistent with the standing analysis in Dep't of Commerce v. [read post]
28 Feb 2023, 3:51 pm by Amy Howe
Alito was skeptical of Prelogar’s efforts to draw a line between regulatory programs and programs involving benefits. [read post]
28 Feb 2023, 12:22 pm by Jonathan Zasloff
— Bottom line: this wasn’t a great opinion, and could have been a lot better, but we shouldn’t panic. [read post]