Search for: "Marks v. United States"
Results 3101 - 3120
of 9,189
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Jun 2019, 4:01 am
United States, in which the justices will decide whether a provision of the federal sex-offender act violates the nondelegation doctrine, is “part of a campaign to use the courts in service of a libertarian rollback of the administrative state. [read post]
30 May 2016, 10:00 am
* IP wrangling (briefly) delays Mourinho's anointment as new Manchester United managerWhat was the hold up with the Special One's latest deal? [read post]
5 Aug 2016, 2:51 pm
State v. [read post]
14 Apr 2022, 9:21 am
Apple Inc. v. [read post]
21 Oct 2024, 10:48 am
The team filed at least 30 different “intent-to-use” trademark applications with the United States Patent and Trademark Office (“USPTO”). [read post]
21 Oct 2024, 10:48 am
The team filed at least 30 different “intent-to-use” trademark applications with the United States Patent and Trademark Office (“USPTO”). [read post]
2 May 2025, 11:35 am
"Gone are tens of billions of dollars in contracts to NGOs at home and abroad that often undermined the interests and foreign policy of the United States. [read post]
11 Sep 2007, 1:27 pm
See e.g., Missouri v. [read post]
23 Feb 2007, 9:49 am
United States v. [read post]
10 Jan 2018, 11:17 am
At least twenty United States rivers are currently subject to interstate compacts. [read post]
11 Apr 2022, 5:43 pm
Today, the Sixth Circuit affirmed on all grounds in United States v. [read post]
25 Apr 2022, 4:40 pm
United States [read post]
19 Jul 2013, 11:50 am
Mark Goldstein contributed to the content of this post. [read post]
18 Jan 2013, 11:24 am
Swarovski sued Building #19 and managed to obtain a preliminary injunction.Crystal figurine by... oh, wait.Yes, indeed: Swarovski persuaded a United States district court judge to prohibit Building #19 from using the word Swarovski in an ad that stated, truthfully, that the company was selling Swarovski crystal collectibles. [read post]
18 Jan 2013, 11:24 am
Swarovski sued Building #19 and managed to obtain a preliminary injunction.Crystal figurine by... oh, wait.Yes, indeed: Swarovski persuaded a United States district court judge to prohibit Building #19 from using the word Swarovski in an ad that stated, truthfully, that the company was selling Swarovski crystal collectibles. [read post]
15 Jul 2011, 6:09 am
Mar.22, 2011) (citation & quotation marks omitted); see United Mine Workers of Am. v. [read post]
17 Oct 2011, 10:01 am
Holder, the United States seeks to remove from the United States a lawful permanent resident who has lived here since 1974, because he was convicted of voluntary manslaughter in 1989. [read post]
14 Jun 2010, 6:30 pm
Professor Mark Lemley On May 20, 2010, 86 law, economics, public policy and business professors filed an amici curiae brief with the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit seeking the en banc review of the panel decision in In re Ciprofloxacin Hydrochloride Antitrust Litigation, which issued on April 29, 2010. [read post]
5 Nov 2010, 2:14 am
” An early decision stated that the Panel could perform “limited modest factual research,” InfoSpace.com, Inc. v. [read post]
23 Jun 2017, 1:27 pm
In United States EEOC v. [read post]
