Search for: "Matter of Rules Adoption" Results 3101 - 3120 of 22,063
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Jun 2022, 3:23 pm by Russell Knight
In addition to other matters the court may choose to address” Ill. [read post]
26 Jun 2022, 1:48 pm by Tobias Lutzi
Must Article 4 of Regulation (EC) No 593/2008 of 17 June 2008 on the law applicable to contractual obligations (Rome I) be interpreted as applying to the situation referred to by the third question referred for a preliminary ruling and, if so, which contract must be taken into consideration? [read post]
26 Jun 2022, 8:20 am by Professor Alberto Bernabe
  However, this might not prevent the application of other applicable laws related to discrimination.- the exceptions also recognize circumstances in which a lawyer may not be disciplined for expressing their views on matters of public concern.Overall, the newly adopted rule in New York is an improvement over versions of the rule I have seen elsewhere, but I confess I have not seen all of them. [read post]
26 Jun 2022, 6:23 am by David Adelstein
At this time, the Court held Ohio would not recognize the cardinal change doctrine: This Court finds that the Ohio Supreme Court would decline to adopt the cardinal change doctrine as a rule of law in Ohio. [read post]
26 Jun 2022, 12:28 am by Bill Henderson
But in this case, because of the subject matter, they are all white men. [read post]
25 Jun 2022, 4:15 pm by sierralit
Under the one-bite rule, dog owners cannot be held legally liable for a dog’s first bite injury unless a dog owner knew a dog previously bit another person.California got rid of the one-bite rule decades ago and in its place, the state adopted a policy of strict liability. [read post]
25 Jun 2022, 12:01 pm by Ilya Somin
  I would have been happy if the Supreme Court had adopted such a rule, and declined to reverse Roe on that basis. [read post]
24 Jun 2022, 9:26 am
We now adopt those founding principles of this great nation and caution courts against liberal judges ruling on an 'evolving moral standard.' There is nothing in the constitution that allows this country to have evolving moral standards and it is the duty of this and every court to return this country to the standards of the late 1700s. [read post]
24 Jun 2022, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
”  As I said in remarks following the death of David Hartman, a truly charismatic figure, that thirty-year relationship did not in the slightest make me any more “religious” in a conventional sense nor, for that matter, any more Zionist. [read post]
23 Jun 2022, 9:01 pm by Hester M. Peirce
(“The Division is considering recommending that the Commission adopt rules under the Advisers Act to address lack of transparency, conflicts of interest, and certain other matters involving private fund advisers. [read post]
23 Jun 2022, 12:27 pm by Eugene Volokh
Jones (2012) (holding that installation of a tracking device was "a physical intrusion [that] would have been considered a 'search' within the meaning of the Fourth Amendment when it was adopted")…. [read post]
23 Jun 2022, 6:27 am by Alex Phipps
The Court of Appeals reviewed the matter under its certiorari jurisdiction. [read post]