Search for: "PRECISION STANDARD V US" Results 3101 - 3120 of 4,554
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Nov 2012, 1:50 pm by Bexis
  Not surprisingly, that’s often the precise reason why smart plaintiffs’ lawyers (don’t kid yourself, most of them are) press such theories.The first thing we normally do in such situations is take a look at the Restatement (Third) of Torts, Products Liability. [read post]
31 Oct 2012, 5:00 am by Steve McConnell
Off-label use can be, in many circumstances, the standard of care. [read post]
27 Oct 2012, 10:25 am by Kenneth Anderson
Drone warfare undoubtably causes more casualties than the Obama administration has admitted to, but measured by the historical standards of using force in war and by the alternatives that one can actually bring to bear, it is still by far the most precise and sparing of civilians. [read post]
25 Oct 2012, 1:00 pm by Eugene Volokh
Such vague standards are unconstitutional even in a nonpublic forum, precisely because of the risk of viewpoint discrimination. [read post]
23 Oct 2012, 12:35 pm by Florian Mueller
Judge Robart particularly relies on the Federal Circuit's Lucent Technologies, Inc. v. [read post]
13 Oct 2012, 9:23 pm
This is how these matters have come up before us. [read post]
11 Oct 2012, 11:13 am by Glenn
This strategy could have serious repercussions because the FTC’s use of unfair competition as a surrogate for what the antitrust laws do not or cannot reach would be unbounded from the rigorous Sherman Act standards of unlawful monopolization. [read post]
3 Oct 2012, 2:49 pm by W.F. Casey Ebsary, Jr.
In the taxonomy of standards of proof, probable cause is lower than proof beyond a reasonable doubt, see Locke v. [read post]