Search for: "People v Paine"
Results 3101 - 3120
of 3,323
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Nov 2008, 4:00 pm
The first point is that pleasure and pain, the touchstones of Utilitarianism, are actually disputed concepts. [read post]
3 Nov 2008, 7:50 pm
- Wyeth v. [read post]
3 Nov 2008, 1:35 pm
On the other, it seems that the American people have already accepted that justices make decisions according to their own policy preferences. [read post]
2 Nov 2008, 10:11 pm
Ted Frank, a well known tort "reformer" at Overlawyered jumps into the action (Cantrell v. [read post]
29 Oct 2008, 12:00 pm
The Wyeth v. [read post]
24 Oct 2008, 9:38 pm
The decision made in Murray v. [read post]
18 Oct 2008, 8:17 pm
An English court (R. v. [read post]
12 Oct 2008, 4:12 pm
Many people remember the Liebeck v. [read post]
7 Oct 2008, 4:54 am
Supreme Court agreed to take the case, Wyeth v. [read post]
7 Oct 2008, 2:46 am
Scotusblog's detailed rundown on Lee v. [read post]
2 Oct 2008, 1:00 pm
A majority in Schmidt v. [read post]
23 Sep 2008, 5:15 am
Fair v. [read post]
19 Sep 2008, 12:05 pm
Bookstores v Auxiliary Serv. [read post]
16 Sep 2008, 6:35 am
This contrasts quite vividly with the amount and intensity of critical commentary on Brown v Board of Education, affirmative action, and so on, from the most passionate, committed scholars of race justice. [read post]
13 Sep 2008, 11:21 am
Above his signature, the form contained an attestation, under the pains and penalties of perjury, that the information provided by the defendant was true and accurate. [read post]
13 Sep 2008, 6:51 am
But I'm thankful he did, as this is one decision that we should all be aware of, and wary of.In a 2-1 unpublished decision in Buckley v. [read post]
12 Sep 2008, 2:26 pm
’ ‘McCain v. [read post]
10 Sep 2008, 11:03 am
The Defendant's mental condition at the time of the offense bars the adoption of the death penalty under the rationale of Atkins, 536 U.S. 304 and Roper v. [read post]
9 Sep 2008, 5:00 am
Ten Reasons Why You Should Teach Here — And Three Why You Shouldn't (v. 2.0) 1. [read post]
7 Sep 2008, 8:45 am
This was the holding of the recent Court of Appeals decision in People v. [read post]
