Search for: "People v. House"
Results 3101 - 3120
of 11,351
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Dec 2020, 1:39 pm
This is evident in modern day voter suppression, policies that deny Black people fair housing opportunities, redlining practices that perpetuate segregation, legislation such as the Homestead Act, which actively denied economic justice opportunities to Black people, and mass incarceration. [read post]
4 Feb 2011, 10:40 pm
I have written extensively over the past year or so about the effects of a seminal Supreme Court decision in Padilla v. [read post]
29 Jan 2009, 5:04 am
Now she’s headed to the White House. [read post]
10 Mar 2022, 9:14 am
Pictures of bombed out buildings and civilian casualty counts are a reminder that aggravating and expensive as ADA and FHA lawsuits can be, taking these disputes to court is a luxury most people in the world do not enjoy. [read post]
18 Aug 2013, 4:03 pm
The Fourth Amendment establishes that, "[t]he right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated . . . ." [read post]
27 Jan 2017, 10:00 am
” If we limit the Article V “We the People” to loyal states, we need neither nationalize it, like Ackerman, nor make it intergenerational, like Colby, nor allow it to be subject to coercion, like Harrison and Amar. [read post]
23 Dec 2016, 8:11 am
(Holt v. [read post]
4 Aug 2020, 1:36 pm
Supreme Court decision in Mcgirt v. [read post]
7 Jun 2008, 2:01 pm
The company involved in the dispute is not going to be objective enough to handle the public relations' aspects (even if it has its own in-house public relations people) and we lawyers (despite thinking otherwise) are just not very good at it. [read post]
17 Aug 2012, 9:17 am
Court of Appeals this week found in United States v. [read post]
27 Feb 2011, 12:39 am
Mr Jeremy Reed, counsel for the claimants in both actions, contended that the words “technical or commercial information” in the definition of “intellectual property” should be understood as if it read “protectable technical or commercial information”relying upon the House of Lords decision in Douglas v. [read post]
17 Oct 2015, 8:19 am
Glassford v. [read post]
16 Dec 2009, 4:38 pm
As mentioned earlier in the week, Facebook has changed their privacy settings; once again, the social network has people concerned. [read post]
10 Jul 2023, 2:18 pm
Right, I am back from a two week holiday (it was lovely thank you) so onwards… Crescent Trustees Limited v Behjat. [read post]
12 Mar 2020, 8:04 am
Trump v. [read post]
1 May 2008, 8:33 am
"I think before Katrina, people saw FEMA as the answer to getting a house rebuilt," he said. [read post]
3 Nov 2021, 8:16 am
When there is marital real estate in an Illinois divorce there are three options: sell the house and split the proceeds, one spouse keeps the house, or the other spouse keeps the house. [read post]
3 Apr 2017, 7:22 am
Montgomery's computer and, eventually, his house, where they found other incriminating evidence. [read post]
25 Mar 2019, 9:04 am
A court ruled that “stop-and-frisk” violated the Fourth Amendment in Floyd v. [read post]
28 Jan 2024, 8:39 am
McCall v. [read post]
