Search for: "People v. House"
Results 3101 - 3120
of 12,999
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 May 2023, 9:51 pm
As discussed in my previous post, O'Connor endorsed a very broad view of public use in her opinion for the Court in Hawaii Housing Authority v. [read post]
8 May 2017, 10:02 am
Anishinaabe law and “The Round House. [read post]
22 Jan 2015, 5:00 am
The Court also heard oral argument Wednesday in Texas Department of Housing and Community Affairs v. [read post]
16 Jun 2007, 7:42 pm
The house was wide open and people were traveling in and out of the residence, carrying bags of unknown property and articles of clothing.' PSOF, Exh. [read post]
16 Jan 2020, 12:16 pm
And Humphreys busied himself ordering multiple people arrested people for failing to swear allegiance to the Confederate States of America. [read post]
8 Aug 2009, 1:51 am
Greene, and Kyles v. [read post]
6 Jan 2012, 11:22 am
Amerind Risk Management (Indian housing, tribal sovereign immunity) and Beaulieu v. [read post]
27 Jan 2016, 2:16 pm
Related Cases: Jewel v. [read post]
8 Nov 2009, 9:06 am
What a great title for a symposium: "A Vain and Idle Enactment: Could McDonald v. [read post]
11 Jun 2016, 4:16 am
See Jordan v. [read post]
23 Jan 2015, 6:40 am
She learned there were two computers in the house, a laptop for the family and a desktop computer in the bedroom. [read post]
16 Dec 2019, 6:01 am
In this instance, we got a New York State Court of Appeals ruling, People v. [read post]
8 Dec 2020, 9:11 am
FMR LLC (2014)), limited its reach (rejecting a broad reading of its anti-shredding provision in Yates v. [read post]
3 May 2023, 11:49 am
" Her endorsement of a relatively narrow definition of "public use" that excludes private "economic development" takings is at odds with her opinion for the Court in Hawaii Housing Authority v. [read post]
4 Apr 2011, 1:46 pm
See, e.g., Wiggins v. [read post]
6 Feb 2024, 3:36 pm
That argument isn’t at issue in the case: Everyone agrees that if Donald Trump was subject to Section 3 as President, and if he engaged in an insurrection on January 6, 2021, then that conduct rendered him legally ineligible to serve as President or in the other covered state and federal offices (absent action by two-thirds of both houses of Congress to eliminate that disability). [read post]
26 Oct 2011, 6:50 am
This was the case in U.S. v. [read post]
24 Nov 2020, 10:00 am
The Supreme Court in Franklin v. [read post]
18 Jun 2010, 8:06 am
Jeffers, 342 U.S. 48, 51 (1951): The Fourth Amendment prohibits both unreasonable searches and unreasonable seizures, and its protection extends to both "houses" and "effects. [read post]
10 Jul 2012, 7:35 am
In Shirley v. [read post]
