Search for: "People v. House" Results 3101 - 3120 of 11,274
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Nov 2021, 8:16 am by Russell Knight
  When there is marital real estate in an Illinois divorce there are three options: sell the house and split the proceeds, one spouse keeps the house, or the other spouse keeps the house. [read post]
28 Mar 2007, 1:07 am
KINGS COUNTYCriminal PracticeDefendant Guilty of Disorderly Conduct for Smoking 'On or In' NYCTA Real Estate Incidental to Operations People v. [read post]
18 Jul 2016, 11:45 am
Goff and `needed to respond to try to deter anybody from coming to my house with the long list of people to do me harm. [read post]
27 Feb 2011, 12:39 am by INFORRM
   Mr Jeremy Reed, counsel for the claimants in both actions, contended that the words “technical or commercial information” in the definition of “intellectual property” should be understood as if it read “protectable technical or commercial information”relying upon the House of Lords decision in Douglas v. [read post]
24 Oct 2022, 8:30 am by Unknown
"Nowhere to Go: A Regional Human Rights-Based Approach to Climate Displacee Protection in Southeast Asia," Washington International Law Journal, vol. 31, no. 2 (2022) [full-text]"The Sea Swallowed our Houses and Rice Fields: The Vulnerability to Climate Change of Coastal People in Guinea-Bissau, West Africa," Human Ecology, Latest Articles, 12 Sept. 2022 [free full-text]"A systematic review of climate migration research: gaps in existing… [read post]
24 May 2024, 1:49 am by Tessa Shepperson
  It is due to be debated in the House of Lords today. [read post]
31 Mar 2025, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
The Court adopted this strategy in U.S. v. [read post]
24 Jun 2016, 8:15 am
  These voter restrictions are the result of the Supreme Court’s 2013 decision in Shelby County v. [read post]
6 Jun 2022, 4:23 am by Sherry F. Colb
 The Supreme Court's decision in District of Columbia v. [read post]
6 Sep 2022, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
Unless a convention of the states assembled pursuant to Article V proceeds to ignore the language of Article V, the current structure of the Senate cannot be changed, and even permissible amendments will need the assent of 38 states. [read post]