Search for: "People v. Render"
Results 3101 - 3120
of 5,284
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Feb 2014, 12:12 pm
Marshall (2006) case (which I observed as a clerk) and the Stern v. [read post]
14 Feb 2014, 10:29 am
The landowner's actions relying on a valid permit must be so substantial that the municipal action results in serious loss rendering the improvements essentially valueless" (Town of Orangetown v Magee, 88 NY2d at 47-48; see Glacial Aggregates LLC v Town of Yorkshire, 14 NY3d at 136; People v Miller, 304 NY at 109; Matter of RC Enters. v Town of Patterson, 42 AD3d at 544; People ex rel. [read post]
14 Feb 2014, 10:29 am
The landowner's actions relying on a valid permit must be so substantial that the municipal action results in serious loss rendering the improvements essentially valueless" (Town of Orangetown v Magee, 88 NY2d at 47-48; see Glacial Aggregates LLC v Town of Yorkshire, 14 NY3d at 136; People v Miller, 304 NY at 109; Matter of RC Enters. v Town of Patterson, 42 AD3d at 544; People ex rel. [read post]
13 Feb 2014, 9:01 pm
He says, for example, drawing on the gender-based peremptory case, J.E.B. v. [read post]
13 Feb 2014, 11:36 am
In D.C. v. [read post]
11 Feb 2014, 10:00 am
Co. v. [read post]
11 Feb 2014, 7:00 am
Co. v. [read post]
10 Feb 2014, 11:38 am
To hold otherwise, the Court held, would expect far too much perfection from our legal system.By contrast, despite the fact that many people desperately try to get out of jury service, sometimes, you've got someone who's trying desperately to get on. [read post]
10 Feb 2014, 3:34 am
Moss v. [read post]
8 Feb 2014, 2:17 pm
Nevertheless, pursuant to the Court’s ruling in People v. [read post]
7 Feb 2014, 7:40 am
More than 200 people not authorized by the protective order received the report. [read post]
6 Feb 2014, 1:31 pm
But there are limits, as Wednesday’s Florida Court of Appeal decision in Root v. [read post]
6 Feb 2014, 3:57 am
One of the most relevant and thorough is US v. [read post]
5 Feb 2014, 12:32 pm
People v. [read post]
5 Feb 2014, 4:30 am
In Ross v. [read post]
4 Feb 2014, 9:01 pm
In Jensen v. [read post]
3 Feb 2014, 10:02 pm
., Appellants, v. [read post]
3 Feb 2014, 9:30 pm
In response, southern segregationists embraced the assistance rendered by these Yankee collaborators, and in the years to come, southerners utilized the “northern messiahs” in executing a massive resistance to the Supreme Court’s desegregation decrees and the civil rights movement in general. [read post]
3 Feb 2014, 7:47 am
Feiner v. [read post]
2 Feb 2014, 2:00 pm
In the view of the authors, RIPA also falls foul of Article 8 in being insufficiently clear and certain about “the circumstances in which the executive may or may not authorise interception of communications data”; this renders it not “in accordance with the law” for the purposes of the ECHR. [read post]
