Search for: "People v. Waits"
Results 3101 - 3120
of 5,499
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Apr 2014, 1:22 pm
("Wait, can we do that?" [read post]
8 Apr 2014, 7:26 am
The entire fairness standard, first set forth in the decision in Weinberger v. [read post]
7 Apr 2014, 5:07 am
See United States v. [read post]
5 Apr 2014, 12:21 pm
1) Give district courts discretion to punish frivolous suit 2) Forcing patent holders to be more clear in their claims in Biosig v. [read post]
4 Apr 2014, 3:04 pm
Up to $8000 per work—the statute says up to $150,000, but a jury has awarded that in Capitol Records v. [read post]
4 Apr 2014, 12:03 pm
E.g., Kelly v. [read post]
4 Apr 2014, 6:08 am
She should probably stop sticking her nose in other people’s business. [read post]
3 Apr 2014, 11:30 pm
While waiting for my flight to leave San Diego on my way to Washington, DC for the ABA Antitrust Spring Meeting, I saw on Twitter—the best source for immediate Supreme Court news—that the Supreme Court had decided Lexmark International, Inc. v. [read post]
3 Apr 2014, 5:03 pm
Played that role even before Folsom v. [read post]
3 Apr 2014, 2:49 pm
Hurles, 12-1472 – if that day ever comes – people will roll their eyes and look around for Ashton Kutcher. [read post]
31 Mar 2014, 6:57 pm
Under the FISA Amendment Act of 2008, reauthorized in 2012, warrantless wiretapping was approved by federal authorities, although this is currently being challenged and fought against via the recent decision of the United States Supreme Court in Clapper v. [read post]
31 Mar 2014, 8:18 am
Although I would have liked to see a longer wait period than 30 days, at least it stops lawyers from trying to contact people in the hours and days right after a bad crash. [read post]
29 Mar 2014, 11:28 pm
’This will no doubt come as a surprise to many people, who would not have held any real doubts that gunpowder was ‘invented’ by the Chinese, around the 9th century C.E. [read post]
28 Mar 2014, 10:43 am
Supreme Court decided Missouri v. [read post]
27 Mar 2014, 9:01 pm
In Raven v. [read post]
27 Mar 2014, 12:46 pm
He obviously has a perspective of his own on the underlying issues — he was, for instance, a forceful critic of the Court’s Employment Division v. [read post]
24 Mar 2014, 4:32 am
But wait. [read post]
21 Mar 2014, 11:58 am
Aigner v. [read post]
21 Mar 2014, 4:21 am
Maxian v. [read post]
20 Mar 2014, 11:08 am
Beastie Boys v. [read post]
