Search for: "Person v. Person"
Results 3101 - 3120
of 123,211
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Mar 2013, 8:44 pm
But those are the rules of the game the Court of Appeals has recently signed off on in Auqui v. [read post]
29 Jun 2011, 3:22 pm
The case is captioned Hartsel v. [read post]
30 Mar 2012, 8:28 pm
The Fourth District Court of Appeal's recent ruling in Durse v. [read post]
21 Mar 2013, 8:02 am
In this week’s case (Bialkowski v. [read post]
5 Feb 2017, 1:56 pm
Knowledgeable Spartanburg personal injury attorney Patrick E. [read post]
5 Feb 2017, 1:56 pm
Knowledgeable Spartanburg personal injury attorney Patrick E. [read post]
18 Apr 2011, 5:57 am
Russell v. [read post]
7 Sep 2022, 8:16 am
In Weis v. [read post]
23 Jul 2017, 9:43 pm
The UK Supreme Court's judgment in Lilly v Actavis has profound implications for the scope of protection provided by patent claims in the UK. [read post]
9 Aug 2009, 9:59 pm
Noonan -- The Supreme Court in KSR International Co. v. [read post]
8 Dec 2008, 10:25 am
S and Marper v United Kingdom (Application Nos 30562/04 and 30566/04) European Court of Human Rights “The blanket and indiscriminate nature of the powers of retention of fingerprints, cellular samples and DNA profiles of persons suspected but not convicted of offences failed to strike a fair balance between the competing public and private interests. [read post]
13 Nov 2009, 1:59 am
Regina (Manchester City Council) v St Helens Metropolitan Borough Council Court of Appeal "Once the Secretary of State for Health had determined that a person was ordinarily resident in a particular area, that local authority had the responsibility to fund a care package, albeit that another local authority had set up the package. [read post]
23 May 2013, 12:00 am
In Apple v. [read post]
2 Nov 2009, 4:22 am
Regina (L) v Commissioner of Police of the Metropolis (Secretary of State for the Home Department and another intervening) [2009] UKSC 3; [2009] WLR (D) 310 “Information about a person's convictions which was systematically collected and stored in central records and was available for many years after the convictions had receded into the past could fall within [...] [read post]
2 Jul 2009, 2:13 am
Boyle v SCA Packaging Ltd (Equality and Human Rights Commission intervening) [2009] UKHL 37; [2009] WLR (D) 222 “When determining whether a person was disabled within the meaning of the Disability Discrimination Act 1995 by reason of having an impairment which, though capable of being controlled by measures taken to treat or control it, would be [...] [read post]
22 Apr 2008, 1:30 am
Midlands Co-Operative Society Ltd v Revenue and Customs Commissioners Court of Appeal “A taxable person was entitled to assign to another any benefit of repayment he enjoyed from the overpayment of value-added tax. [read post]
6 Oct 2020, 6:41 am
Stiner v. [read post]
19 Feb 2008, 1:59 am
Brown v Executors of the Estate of Queen Elizabeth the Queen Mother and Others Court of Appeal “A person who held an irrational and scandalous belief that he was the son of the late Princess Margaret was nevertheless entitled to have a substantive hearing of his claim to inspect the wills of the princess and the Queen Mother. [read post]
20 Oct 2011, 2:48 am
Simpson (as assignee of Alan Catchpole) v Norfolk and Norwich University Hospital NHS Trust [2011] EWCA Civ 1149; [2011] WLR (D) 294 “A claim for damages for personal injury was a chose in action capable of assignment. [read post]
26 Nov 2009, 2:18 am
Office of Fair Trading v Abbey National plc and Others Supreme Court "Charges levied by banks on personal current account customers in respect of unauthorised overdrafts were part of a package of consideration for the package of banking services provided and accordingly their fairness was exempt from review by the Office of Fair Trading. [read post]
