Search for: "SCALES v. STATE"
Results 3101 - 3120
of 4,627
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Jun 2010, 3:21 am
Liberty along with Haw have tried to challenge those powers under human rights law, but, after victory in the High Court, ultimately failed to convince the Court of Appeal (see Haw, R (on the application of) v Secretary of State for the Home Department & Anor [2006] EWCA Civ 532 (08 May 2006).) [read post]
9 Oct 2023, 3:40 pm
Aug. 14, 2023). [7] See Mobil Oil Corp. v. [read post]
10 Nov 2014, 4:00 am
The notice states that “The Appellants wholly discontinues this Appeal on a without costs basis on consent. [read post]
20 Jan 2009, 10:24 am
Finally, Part V provides for a short conclusion. [read post]
8 Feb 2021, 8:11 am
Court of Appeals, in Jacobson Holman PLLC v. [read post]
29 Jan 2018, 5:42 am
As Justice Brennan noted in his concurring opinion in New York Times Co. v. [read post]
18 May 2012, 6:55 am
These are some of the things I've been tweeting about today: from @wired: "It's Tinkerers v. [read post]
23 May 2007, 4:54 am
The seminal case on point is a U.S. decision, Bridgeman Art Library v. [read post]
15 Nov 2018, 10:40 am
The court elected to continue consideration of State v. [read post]
28 Jun 2011, 2:36 pm
Such discrimination was illustrated on the state level in the case of Bellmore v. [read post]
28 Jun 2018, 6:08 am
The burden is on the defendant to bring forward information about his or her expenses and support obligations, State v. [read post]
11 Jul 2018, 6:00 am
Supreme Court’s decision in Spokeo, Inc. v. [read post]
26 May 2010, 11:14 am
” Of course, this will vary by state, but most child support rules are codified in state statutes which require reasonable and necessary medical and dental expenses to be divided in proportion to the parents’ gross income. [read post]
27 Jun 2011, 2:26 pm
Although not the single pivotal trial, the Focalin XR prescribing information references three additional studies evaluated by reviewers that looked at efficacy in hourly timepoints post dose v. placebo using the same rating scale (SKAMP) as that used in the comparative studies. [read post]
19 Jan 2023, 11:17 am
Before Citizens United v. [read post]
12 Jun 2010, 10:30 am
Much like the standards of obscenity spelled out in Jacobellis v. [read post]
15 Dec 2015, 12:48 pm
Supreme Court in Walling v. [read post]
25 Apr 2013, 7:01 am
Council v. [read post]
19 Jan 2023, 11:17 am
Before Citizens United v. [read post]
6 May 2011, 2:34 pm
There was no authority supporting the individual's contention that the CLRA covered intangible forms of payment, such as the individual's PII, the court said.The decision is Claridge v. [read post]
