Search for: "Securities Investor Protection Corporation" Results 3101 - 3120 of 4,476
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Jun 2012, 6:36 pm by Jordan D. Maglich
 Investors with allowed claims have also received up to $500,000 each in cash advances to cover their losses from the Securities Investor Protection Corporation ("SIPC"), the federally-mandated industry group overseeing the Madoff liquidation, which has distributed over $700 million thus far. [read post]
18 Jun 2012, 7:00 am
May 29, 2012), the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit held that the recording of a sham transaction in the corporate books did not constitute “securities fraud” in violation of Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (“Exchange Act”), 15 U.S.C. [read post]
18 Jun 2012, 7:00 am
May 29, 2012), the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit held that the recording of a sham transaction in the corporate books did not constitute “securities fraud” in violation of Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (“Exchange Act”), 15 U.S.C. [read post]
15 Jun 2012, 8:41 am by Thom Lambert
Filed under: 10b-5, corporate law, disclosure regulation, error costs, financial regulation, insider trading, markets, regulation, securities regulation, SSRN [read post]
15 Jun 2012, 5:00 am by Doug Cornelius
This could be a real problem because the status of investors may change or the securities may be transferred to different investors. [read post]
14 Jun 2012, 7:01 pm
” Institutional and individual investors that have been the victims of securities fraud may be able to recoup their losses sustained due to the negligence of an investment firm, a broker, or an investment adviser. [read post]
6 Jun 2012, 9:49 am by Judy Kwan
The GAO report was a product of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act, which required the GAO to study the SEC’s oversight of FINRA.  [read post]
6 Jun 2012, 9:49 am by Judy Kwan
The GAO report was a product of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act, which required the GAO to study the SEC’s oversight of FINRA. [read post]
6 Jun 2012, 9:42 am by McNabb Associates, P.C.
"The FBI will continue to protect the financial wealth of individuals enabling our economy to continue to grow safely and securely. [read post]
6 Jun 2012, 9:42 am by McNabb Associates, P.C.
"The FBI will continue to protect the financial wealth of individuals enabling our economy to continue to grow safely and securely. [read post]
5 Jun 2012, 6:54 pm
The MMC’s conclusion that the mere existence of certain non-voting rights of an investor can give rise to the ability to influence corporate policy and decisions resonates with the conclusion of the CCI in the order referred above. [read post]
5 Jun 2012, 9:05 am by James Saksa
  Given the large amount of public interest, the potential for fraud, and the appeal it might have to retail investors (of whom the SEC is extra protective), expect crowdfunding to arrive extremely fashionably late. [read post]
5 Jun 2012, 8:19 am by Lovechilde
These can be paid for by ending the subsidies Republicans protect, shutting down corporate tax havens, and fair taxes on Wall Street speculation and the rich. [read post]
5 Jun 2012, 5:17 am by Josh Sturtevant
This is compared to democratically elected politicians and corporations with disparate shareholders. [read post]