Search for: "State v. Court of Appeals, Division I"
Results 3101 - 3120
of 4,098
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 May 2011, 9:49 am
Another decision by this division, Tien v. [read post]
9 May 2011, 11:19 am
I hope the Washington Supreme Court reverses the Division Two decision and establishes clarity on the issue of resultant loss. [read post]
9 May 2011, 11:17 am
As to whether or not the High Court is right in its view that the unregistered gift deed dated February 5, 1968 is not a valid gift and conveyed no title to the defendant 2 is the question for determination in this appeal. [read post]
5 May 2011, 2:11 pm
King County, issued on May 2, 2011, by Division I of the Washington State Court of Appeals, the Court of Appeals dealt with a novel situation. [read post]
4 May 2011, 1:39 pm
Appealed from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Indiana, South Bend Division. [read post]
4 May 2011, 1:37 pm
Court of Appeals, D.C. [read post]
4 May 2011, 11:12 am
The Supreme Court in Surya Devi Rai v. [read post]
4 May 2011, 10:18 am
The Supreme Court in Surya Dev Rai v. [read post]
2 May 2011, 4:00 am
Referee Crespo also bases his rejection of DLOM on case law, including Vick v. [read post]
27 Apr 2011, 5:17 am
” James I. [read post]
25 Apr 2011, 1:38 pm
The City appealed that decision to the New York Court of Appeals, the state’s highest appellate court. [read post]
25 Apr 2011, 4:23 am
First, there was the decision of the Court of Appeal in ETK v News Group Newspapers ([2011] EWCA Civ 439). [read post]
24 Apr 2011, 10:52 am
Apple v Samsung v Apple v Samsung v Apple....Last year the AmeriKat was constantly up-to-date reporting on the latest of the patent mobile phone wars. [read post]
23 Apr 2011, 6:01 pm
Orange County Criminal Court Judge James Marion should have known that a decompensating pro per criminal defendant was not competent when he had a history of severe, chronic mental health problems and presented a defense that his victim was not human, says the Court of Appeal Fourth District Division 3 in its opinon in People v. [read post]
21 Apr 2011, 7:30 am
While it disagreed with these assertions, the California Court of Appeal, Fourth Appellate District, Division One, reversed and remanded the matter because the trial court did not properly apply the best-interests test. [read post]
20 Apr 2011, 11:46 am
Adler) Last night I reviewed the transcript of the oral argument in American Electric Power v. [read post]
20 Apr 2011, 10:16 am
An application for leave to prosecute an interlocutory appeal was allowed by Botsford, J., in the Supreme Judicial Court for the county of Suffolk, and the appeal was reported by her to the Appeals Court. [read post]
20 Apr 2011, 9:00 am
The Authority, on the other hand, argued that it was not until its effort to appeal the Appellate Division determination was denied by the Court of Appeals that it was obliged to serve charges. [read post]
20 Apr 2011, 4:00 am
Why would Prithvi appeal after the attachment had been dissolved (the court briefly addressed and rejected an argument that the appeal was moot), and why would it appeal such an insignificant attachment in the first place? [read post]
20 Apr 2011, 3:29 am
The Court of Appeals overturned the Appellate Division’s holding, reinstating PERB’s determination. [read post]
