Search for: "State v. Gross" Results 3101 - 3120 of 4,577
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Jan 2012, 4:25 pm by INFORRM
Terry, No. 150012/2012, Supreme Court of the State of New York County of New York. [read post]
4 Jan 2012, 1:21 pm
United States, 64 F.3d 206 (5th Cir. 1995); Barnes v. [read post]
4 Jan 2012, 11:10 am
Judge Williams said that even if true, these facts fall short of gross negligence, citing Boyer v. [read post]
4 Jan 2012, 11:10 am
Judge Williams said that even if true, these facts fall short of gross negligence, citing Boyer v. [read post]
4 Jan 2012, 5:01 am by James Edward Maule
Definition of gross estate for RIC stock owned by a nonresident not a citizen of the United States (sec. 2105(d))67. [read post]
4 Jan 2012, 12:13 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Gross negligence, as both parties state, is “conduct that evinces a reckless disregard for the rights of others or ‘smacks’ of intentional wrongdoing,” (Sommer v. [read post]
30 Dec 2011, 8:23 am
King (R-IA) on 12/16/11 Amends the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to clarify that wages paid to unauthorized aliens may not be deducted from gross income. [read post]
30 Dec 2011, 2:45 am by Editor Charlie
AFTRA is a member of the AFL-CIO, which is the largest federation of unions in the United States with over 10 million members. [read post]
30 Dec 2011, 2:02 am
"Meanwhile the 'lottery winnings' case S v AG was grabbing the headlines. [read post]
29 Dec 2011, 10:19 am by The Law Office of Gali Schaham Gordon
New Illegal Deduction Elimination Act- New IDEA Act (H.R. 3720) – amends the Internal Revenue Code (tax code) of 1986 to clarify that wages paid to unauthorized aliens may not be deducted from gross income. [read post]
29 Dec 2011, 1:50 am by Rosalind English
The Queen on the application of Naik v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2011] EWCA Civ 1546 – read judgment The Court of Appeal has confirmed that the exclusion of an Indian Muslim public speaker  from the United Kingdom after making statements which breached the Home Office’s “unacceptable behaviours policy” was lawful,  and that any interference with his rights was justified. [read post]
27 Dec 2011, 9:21 am by Eugene Volokh
The people of this State, in common with the people of this country, profess the general doctrines of Christianity, as the rule of their faith and practice; and to scandalize the author of these doctrines is not only, in a religious point of view, extremely impious, but, even in respect to the obligations due to society, is a gross violation of decency and good order. [read post]