Search for: "State v. Holderness"
Results 3101 - 3120
of 8,247
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 May 2016, 2:46 pm
Seto v. [read post]
31 May 2016, 5:58 am
YES Heiskell v. [read post]
27 May 2016, 2:14 pm
Coyne v. [read post]
26 May 2016, 6:51 am
“Delaware law cannot convert a direct claim that another state‘s law has granted to securities holders by deciding that it actually belongs to the corporation that the securities holder is suing. [read post]
26 May 2016, 6:22 am
Holder, decided in June 2013, invalidating a key provision of the Voting Rights Act. [read post]
24 May 2016, 5:17 pm
Supreme Court’s landmark 2010 decision in Morrison v. [read post]
23 May 2016, 3:22 am
Justice Dickerson’s opinion also drew support from a 2004 ruling by the Massachusetts Supreme Court in Anastos v Sable in which that court upheld application of a minority discount to the valuation of the partnership interest of a partner who wrongfully dissolved the partnership under that state’s statute equivalent to New York Partnership Law § 69. [read post]
20 May 2016, 9:58 am
Holder, No. 0120120821, decision (EEOC, Apr. 20, 2012). [read post]
19 May 2016, 1:23 pm
Marbury v. [read post]
19 May 2016, 8:52 am
On June 21, the Fourth Circuit will hear North Carolina State Conference of the NAACP v. [read post]
18 May 2016, 4:18 pm
Up, Inc. v. [read post]
16 May 2016, 2:48 pm
Holder (N.D. [read post]
16 May 2016, 12:45 pm
Walker (the “Walker Declaration”), Linn Energy has entered into a restructuring support agreement with holders of more than 66.67% of issued debt. [read post]
12 May 2016, 6:14 pm
Samsung, stating: “We are bound by what the statute says, irrespective of policy arguments that may be against it”[xiii]. [read post]
12 May 2016, 11:05 am
In so holding, the Court reaffirmed its holding in Corwin v. [read post]
5 May 2016, 5:38 am
“But the card does no more than state the consecutive kicks record and name plaintiff as the record-holder. [read post]
5 May 2016, 5:05 am
The glyphs used in Klingon are functional, and analogous to typeface designs (which are said in US law to be protectable as industrial designs only, per Adobe Sys. v. [read post]
3 May 2016, 2:41 pm
[Is the United States scaleable? [read post]
3 May 2016, 2:30 pm
Hopefully BMG v. [read post]
2 May 2016, 11:26 am
In patent law, if the holder of such rights does not sue an alleged infringer within six years after the claim arose, the holder loses the right to sue. [read post]
