Search for: "State v. L. B. T."
Results 3101 - 3120
of 3,630
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Sep 2023, 8:08 am
Myers, Pedro L. [read post]
25 Jun 2010, 2:46 am
This weekend the streets of Dublin will be filled with the 2010 L(esbian) G(ay) B(isexual) T(ransgender) Q(ueer) Pride parade—the culmination of weeks of cultural and other celebrations for Dublin Pride 2010. [read post]
25 May 2011, 11:46 pm
United States, 429 U.S. 17 (1976), and Precision Instruments Manufacturing Co. v. [read post]
25 Mar 2011, 8:29 pm
" KSR Int'l Co. v. [read post]
31 Aug 2023, 8:58 am
" Defendant argues that Ashcroft v. [read post]
10 Aug 2022, 5:01 am
[B.] [read post]
3 Nov 2011, 11:53 am
Justice Eakin’s most memorable dissent I’m aware of was in Porreco v. [read post]
11 May 2010, 2:40 am
Speakers will include: • R Jovita Baber, University of Illinois, “Multiplicity of Meanings: Legal Pluralism and the Layer Legality of Land in Sixteenth-century Andes” • Louis Berkvens, Maastricht University, “An Approach of comparative history of legislation” • Juan B. [read post]
11 May 2010, 2:46 am
Speakers will include: • R Jovita Baber, University of Illinois, “Multiplicity of Meanings: Legal Pluralism and the Layer Legality of Land in Sixteenth-century Andes” • Louis Berkvens, Maastricht University, “An Approach of comparative history of legislation” • Juan B. [read post]
15 Jan 2021, 8:25 am
, 92 Notre Dame L. [read post]
8 May 2021, 4:50 am
B and Mr. [read post]
19 Jul 2016, 6:07 pm
Diaz v. [read post]
23 Jan 2019, 8:59 am
§115(d)(3)(E)(iii)] Most importantly, “[t]he musical works database shall be made available to members of the public in a searchable, online format, free of charge. [read post]
15 Aug 2019, 10:36 am
Int’l Minerals & Chem. [read post]
7 Nov 2012, 3:54 am
http://bit.ly/RN4gfL (@OrangeLT) Case In Point: 30(B)(6) Witnesses? [read post]
2 Dec 2019, 1:38 pm
B. [read post]
29 Mar 2012, 4:19 pm
J., McIntyre, L. [read post]
16 Nov 2011, 11:08 am
In any event, the Appellate Division stated that his contention was without merit because the father's income for the purpose of calculating his child support obligation includes imputed income (Family Ct Act 413[1][b][5][iv], [v] ), and thus his income was above the federal poverty income guidelines (see generally s 413[1][g]; Matter of Julianska v. [read post]
22 Dec 2020, 2:33 pm
Tallent v. [read post]
