Search for: "State v. Light"
Results 3101 - 3120
of 25,993
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Apr 2007, 5:57 am
Dahl v. [read post]
9 Feb 2024, 11:37 am
[This is the second installment in a series about the oral argument in Trump v. [read post]
8 Sep 2007, 12:36 pm
The statute can survive strict scrutiny only if it is "narrowly tailored to promote a compelling government interest," United States v. [read post]
20 Jan 2017, 12:52 pm
Acadia Insurance Co. v. [read post]
2 May 2012, 3:47 am
In State v. [read post]
24 Dec 2011, 10:35 am
The fact-finding hearing in The Queen (KN) v LB Barnet [2011] EWHC 2019 (Admin) was heard as long ago as July 2011 but it is worth underlining here as an example of the way the Administrative Court deals with age assessments in the light of the guidance given by the Supreme Court in A v Croydon. [read post]
24 Dec 2011, 10:35 am
The fact-finding hearing in The Queen (KN) v LB Barnet [2011] EWHC 2019 (Admin) was heard as long ago as July 2011 but it is worth underlining here as an example of the way the Administrative Court deals with age assessments in the light of the guidance given by the Supreme Court in A v Croydon. [read post]
18 Feb 2023, 9:45 am
This Court's decision in United States v. [read post]
22 Sep 2015, 8:29 pm
Conservation Comm'n v. [read post]
14 Sep 2011, 11:53 am
Circuit’s Guantanamo detention saga: Suleiman v. [read post]
12 Mar 2018, 11:05 am
Applying this standard, the Court found that, in addressing the debt-equity question, the Tax Court properly evaluated the facts of the case in light of many of the factors deemed relevant by applicable case law, including the adequacy of capitalization of the businesses, availability of outside financing, the presence of written promissory notes, the presence of stated loan terms, the unsecured position of the advances, the failure of the businesses to comply with interest and… [read post]
26 Jul 2024, 5:30 am
Here are the discussion questions for United States v. [read post]
29 Dec 2022, 1:41 pm
At least this is what the Appellate Division held in K.D.M. v. [read post]
8 Jul 2016, 3:38 pm
SUPREME COURT RULES THAT DUI BLOOD TEST REQUIRES A WARRANT On June 23, 2016, the United States Supreme Court issued a decision in the case Birchfield v. [read post]
8 Jul 2016, 3:38 pm
SUPREME COURT RULES THAT DUI BLOOD TEST REQUIRES A WARRANT On June 23, 2016, the United States Supreme Court issued a decision in the case Birchfield v. [read post]
5 Sep 2016, 7:43 am
State v. [read post]
5 Apr 2012, 11:45 am
Maryland, and NLRB v. [read post]
25 Sep 2010, 3:32 pm
State, 2010 Ark. [read post]
23 Jul 2015, 1:15 pm
V. [read post]
23 Mar 2010, 12:12 pm
Matter of Idella Abram v New York State Division of Human Rights, City of Buffalo and Buffalo State Police Department Petitioner brought about this Article 78 proceeding to annul a determination of the New York State Division of Human Rights (Division) which ruled that she failed to establish that respondents discriminated against her based on a disability or retaliated against her based on her filing of a complaint with the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission… [read post]
