Search for: "State v. Mark"
Results 3101 - 3120
of 19,837
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Jan 2016, 4:22 am
As his recent Legal 500 entry states, Tom is as "smooth as silk, and no doubt he will be one soon. [read post]
21 Dec 2017, 4:10 am
Second, although Lord Carnwath favoured effective supervision as the general rationale for a common law obligation to give reasons, the obligation could be justified in the present case (as in Oakley v South Cambridgeshire District Council [2017] 2 P & CR 4, [2017] EWCA Civ 71: see Mark Elliott’s post) on the basis that “openness and fairness to objectors required the members’ reasons to be stated” (at para 57,… [read post]
11 Aug 2016, 12:36 pm
In Bachar v. [read post]
12 Aug 2023, 4:37 am
Anna Maria Stein reviewed a recent EUIPO BoA’s decision, which stated that a 3D trade mark described as a “heart-based bread roll” is devoid of the necessary minimum degree of distinctive character. [read post]
19 Aug 2010, 9:28 am
Bosch and Mark J. [read post]
30 Nov 2012, 5:13 pm
This post was written by Mark Mustian. [read post]
28 Jun 2016, 12:00 am
In a Decision handed down on April 22, 2016, the Honorable Mark G. [read post]
6 Oct 2006, 8:42 am
Amerimax Real Estate Partners, Inc. v. [read post]
21 Jun 2008, 10:01 am
The Baze DecisionOn April 16, 2008, the United States Supreme Court issued its plurality opinion inBaze v. [read post]
2 Dec 2010, 1:06 pm
You define a set of legal criteria which, if satisfied, constitute a legal state of likelihood of confusion; then you tick the boxes for the various criteria. [read post]
22 Jul 2022, 4:34 pm
From Riseandshine Corp. v. [read post]
8 Jan 2010, 1:43 pm
Arguing for Mark A. [read post]
11 Jun 2007, 9:59 am
The Third Department was confronted with such a situation on June 7th in Matter of Fireman's Assn. of State of New York v French Am. [read post]
3 Dec 2012, 5:01 am
Medisim Ltd. v. [read post]
10 Aug 2011, 3:00 am
” As the Court of Appeals said in Chittenden v Wurster, 152 NY 345, the civil divisions of the State are its counties and its towns and its villages. [read post]
3 Dec 2018, 12:08 am
” Chanel, Inc. v. [read post]
20 Aug 2012, 2:06 am
See Jacobs v. [read post]
21 May 2011, 12:08 pm
Hank Peters revealed that Rakofsky v. [read post]
1 Aug 2013, 6:38 am
At ABAJournal, Mark Walsh reviews the Court’s decision in this past Term’s Maryland v. [read post]
24 Nov 2020, 11:32 am
California mark the third round of ACA litigation that has reached the country’s highest court. [read post]
