Search for: "State v. Marks" Results 3101 - 3120 of 19,483
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Dec 2016, 8:23 pm by Kate Howard
The petition of the day is: Belmora LLC v. [read post]
8 May 2025, 8:55 am by Lawrence Solum
This paper takes an in-depth look at the following topics: (i) the constitutional text and structure, (ii) ratification, (iii) the state elections of 1800 in Virginia and New York, (iv) Rufus King's advocacy in the Senate (1816-1824), and (v) the state elections in New York in 1823-24 (including Rufus King's role in those elections). [read post]
31 Mar 2017, 2:56 pm by Nikki Siesel
Seeking further guidance, we turn to the Federal Circuit, wherein the issue was addressed in Swatch AG v. [read post]
17 Mar 2011, 1:27 am by Ben Vernia
Judge Polster reviewed the long history of qui tam actions in the United States, and noted that the Supreme Court, in Vermont Agency of Natural Resources v. [read post]
11 Apr 2017, 8:09 pm by Sme
State of Wyoming (10th Circuit, March 28, 2017) (affirming dismissal of McCoy's complaint, among other things, because it lacked any plausible discrimination claim, and he waived any challenge to his retaliation claim)*Poff v. [read post]
13 Aug 2010, 9:09 am by Thaddeus Mason Pope, J.D., Ph.D.
This morning, the New Jersey Appellate Division released its opinion in Betancourt v. [read post]
30 Jun 2019, 3:00 pm
IGE stated that there is no absolute right to register a famous trade mark irrespective of the issue of protection. [read post]
8 Aug 2023, 9:20 am by Marcel Pemsel
This is the question at the heart of the General Court’s judgment in Apart v EUIPO - S. [read post]
Consistent with the Second, Sixth, and Eighth circuit courts’ holdings, the 7th Circuit held in Richardson v. [read post]
25 Jan 2020, 5:36 am by Cassandra Maas
The State of Florida appealed to the Florida Supreme Court following a postconviction order that set aside Mark Anthony Poole’s 2011 death sentence, which became final in 2015. [read post]
22 May 2014, 3:51 am by Amy Howe
  He concludes that “the real effect of [United States v.] [read post]