Search for: "State v. Miles"
Results 3101 - 3120
of 4,306
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Jan 2009, 4:45 pm
Stewart v. [read post]
12 Jul 2020, 6:07 pm
District Court, where new complaints slowed or held steady and arguments were generally handled differently, but both venues released rulings that were felt far beyond the 2,000 square miles of the First State. [read post]
22 Jan 2018, 9:49 pm
House of Prayer Ministries v Rush County Board of Zoning Appeals, 2018 WL 414862 (Ind. [read post]
22 Jan 2019, 8:00 am
Last week, in Sellars v. [read post]
24 Jun 2021, 11:50 am
Customs and Border Protection, whose function is supposedly to monitor the U.S. border, were used to surveil protests against police violence in over 15 cities in the summer of 2020, many hundreds of miles from the border. [read post]
24 Jun 2021, 11:50 am
Customs and Border Protection, whose function is supposedly to monitor the U.S. border, were used to surveil protests against police violence in over 15 cities in the summer of 2020, many hundreds of miles from the border. [read post]
31 Mar 2020, 6:42 am
If you have any questions concerning the Briggs v. [read post]
31 Mar 2020, 6:42 am
If you have any questions concerning the Briggs v. [read post]
25 Mar 2010, 9:45 am
In summation, defense counsel had stated that damages should be no more than $15,000. [read post]
15 Jun 2020, 11:46 am
State Farm). [read post]
1 Jun 2017, 8:51 am
Under the new system, they were compensated $0.575 per mile. [read post]
8 Jan 2010, 1:35 pm
” United States v. [read post]
13 Jul 2015, 11:45 am
Iraqi efforts will likely be helped by the four F-16 fighter jets that arrived in Baghdad from the United States this Monday. [read post]
4 Apr 2018, 10:30 pm
Sierra Club v. [read post]
20 Jan 2021, 5:01 am
” In other words, the New York and Chicago juntas, though almost 800 miles apart, participated in a single conspiracy. [read post]
26 Aug 2013, 8:14 am
The Microsoft v. [read post]
25 Jun 2021, 10:19 am
In Kedar Nath v. [read post]
26 Apr 2021, 7:52 am
In November 2019, the Board dismissed the appeal and found that there was a likelihood of confusion by considering, first, the average degree of visual and phonetic similarity of the marks at issue and, second, the identity of the goods in question.The Applicant subsequently appealed to the General Court.The General Court’s considerationsRelevant public and its level of attentionThe General Court confirmed the Board’s finding that the relevant public was the French public, composed of… [read post]
12 Jul 2014, 12:27 pm
I was perfectly content with my life until Jeremy suggested that I blog about the United States Patent and Trademark Office (TTAB) Harry Winston v. [read post]
