Search for: "The State Bar Court of the State Bar of California"
Results 3101 - 3120
of 11,366
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 May 2019, 9:57 am
This article by Jeremiah Lowe and Victoria Lazar was published in the May 2019 issue of Consumer Attorneys of San Diego’s Trial Bar News. [read post]
31 May 2019, 3:00 am
Supreme Court is expected to rule on the legality of the citizenship question. [read post]
30 May 2019, 9:09 am
But California in particular has some stringent criteria (compared to other states for companies to prove why the worker is a contractor when that fact is disputed. [read post]
30 May 2019, 8:11 am
The court unanimously denied review on the second issue the case raised, involving the validity of a prohibition barring the knowing provision of sex-, race- or disability-selective abortions. [read post]
29 May 2019, 6:59 am
In April 2018, the California Supreme Court issued a landmark ruling in Dynamex Operations West, Inc. v. [read post]
28 May 2019, 1:27 pm
The court found that such claims treated the website as the publisher or speaker of the third party sales content and were therefore barred. [read post]
28 May 2019, 8:13 am
On April 22, 2019, the court ruled that the Indiana Right-to-Farm law barred a nuisance lawsuit brought against a farmer and his two sons. [read post]
28 May 2019, 3:00 am
Bauman, 571 U.S. 117, 137-138 (2014), the Supreme Court rejected general jurisdiction over the German carmaker Daimler in California’s state court. [read post]
27 May 2019, 10:14 am
That was the question before a California appellate court weighing the legality of five convictions for possession of marijuana while incarcerated by the state. [read post]
27 May 2019, 6:17 am
Flourshings Plus, Inc., d/b/a the Tom Cat Bar & Grill, 2019 WL 1958284 (S.D. [read post]
26 May 2019, 5:50 pm
State law enforcement agencies in California can no longer do this because marijuana is no longer flatly outlawed. [read post]
25 May 2019, 6:10 am
In California, state lawmakers did away with cash bail entirely, with pre-trial incarceration depending on severity of offense, rather than payment of fees. [read post]
24 May 2019, 2:00 am
Hall, which held that the Constitution does not bar suits brought by an individual against a State in the courts of another State. [read post]
23 May 2019, 9:33 am
It appears that attorneys in states where the bar offers Casemaker are not able to purchase it on their own. [read post]
23 May 2019, 7:12 am
Most puzzling is City of Newport Beach, California v. [read post]
23 May 2019, 6:41 am
Depending on the harm caused by your use of the nunchucks, you could be held liable in a civil lawsuit, worse, you could face criminal charges in court. [read post]
23 May 2019, 5:38 am
State laws and district courts have been divided on this point. [read post]
22 May 2019, 9:02 am
FINRA barred Dietrich. [read post]
22 May 2019, 4:10 am
Hall, and held that a state cannot be sued in the courts of another state without its consent; he argues that “there was no basis to overrule Hall, because that case was both correct and readily distinguishable from this one, and there were other bases for setting aside what the Nevada courts did here. [read post]
20 May 2019, 9:19 am
But California courts initially found liability (see our article here) and the litigation is ongoing. [read post]
