Search for: "The Supreme Court of New Mexico"
Results 3101 - 3120
of 4,061
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Jun 2011, 1:58 pm
Gedes is in critical condition.Underwear Search Upheld: The New Mexico Supreme Court today upheld a search stemming from a traffic stop in which the "officer pulled the waistband of Defendant's pants and underpants outward six to eight inches, looked down, and saw a plastic bag [of illegal substances] underneath Defendant's underpants. [read post]
17 Jun 2011, 9:32 am
Supreme Court, however, subsequently overruled Bush and the impact of the International Court decision. [read post]
17 Jun 2011, 2:54 am
(Docket Report) District Court New Mexico: Non-practicing plaintiff may not obtain discovery concerning future products under ‘Accelerated market entry’ damages theory: STC.UNM v. [read post]
16 Jun 2011, 9:36 am
For those new to the issue, it's a must-read recap with new details, as well. [read post]
16 Jun 2011, 6:54 am
As of post time, the billboard was to be removed by 8:15 a.m. tomorrow morning, June 17th, by order of a New Mexico Court. [read post]
15 Jun 2011, 7:52 am
Supreme Court, and the Court held that the Executive Branch did not have the authority to compel the state courts to act. [read post]
15 Jun 2011, 7:09 am
Atmospheric Trust Litigation The public trust cases, organized by a non-profit called Our Children’s Trust, were filed in May in state courts in Alaska, Arizona, California, Colorado, Minnesota, Montana, New Mexico, Oregon and Washington and in a federal court in northern California. [read post]
14 Jun 2011, 10:46 am
As a result, Leahy’s bill and the potential for a new round of executions will bear watching. [read post]
11 Jun 2011, 6:27 pm
New Mexico, No. 09-10876, which was orally argued on 2 March, could affect drug testing reports’ admissibility. [read post]
10 Jun 2011, 2:41 am
Shameless spin is nothing new when it comes to sentencing, or re-sentencing, as is the case for Lord Conrad Black. [read post]
9 Jun 2011, 8:01 am
The case echoes the dispute involved in the 2008 Supreme Court decision in Medellin v. [read post]
8 Jun 2011, 10:54 am
Through a comprehensive review of the various international legal standards, decisions and authoritative guidelines applicable to the current conflict in Mexico, the case for a NIAC classification is laid out. [read post]
8 Jun 2011, 7:36 am
In order for the ruling to have effect in state courts, the Supremes ruled, Congress would have to act. [read post]
7 Jun 2011, 5:57 pm
Alamogordo New Mexico is a small desert community that rarely finds itself in the national news. [read post]
7 Jun 2011, 2:17 pm
The dissent argued that the Court’s new element “makes little sense and will create confusion for trial judges and juries. [read post]
7 Jun 2011, 1:44 pm
In 2008, the Supreme Court agreed, and Medellin was executed. [read post]
7 Jun 2011, 10:52 am
(1) I'm not an expert in New Mexico tort law, but in a couple of minutes of research I was able to ascertain that New Mexico does not appear to be especially idiosyncratic with respect to the relevant causes of action: Defamation; false-light publicity; publicity given to private life; and intentional infliction of emotional distress (IIED). [read post]
7 Jun 2011, 7:25 am
Supreme Court unanimously agreed that the United States is obligated to comply with the ICJ decision, but that Congress must act to implement the Court’s decision. [read post]
5 Jun 2011, 1:12 pm
New Mexico Reverse Details Davis. v. [read post]
2 Jun 2011, 12:46 pm
At one time, the Arkansas Supreme Court applied the rule to a medical device in Despain v. [read post]
