Search for: "UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. "
Results 3101 - 3120
of 8,925
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 May 2010, 7:13 pm
It is worth noting that in the recent United States Supreme Court case of District of Columbia v. [read post]
24 Jul 2008, 10:00 pm
United States, 16 F. [read post]
5 Sep 2021, 7:01 am
The Bush administration feared that the United States could then be asked to intervene against domestic terrorist attacks in NATO treaty states in the future. [read post]
29 Oct 2018, 4:04 am
United States Postal Service, “will determine whether the federal government can challenge patents under the America Invents Act. [read post]
24 Jan 2014, 7:46 am
” United States v. [read post]
11 Jul 2018, 11:58 am
United States Telecom Ass'n v. [read post]
10 Jul 2012, 11:30 am
Supreme Court case Branzburg v. [read post]
22 Apr 2022, 7:51 am
(B) The drug or other substance has a currently accepted medical use in treatment in the United States. [read post]
20 Jan 2021, 6:00 am
United States .v Schultz, 333 F.3d 393 (2nd Cir. 2003); United States v. [read post]
30 May 2018, 4:36 am
• Policy considerations and implications in United States v. [read post]
31 Mar 2015, 7:15 am
United States of America, March 26, 2015, O’Connor, R.). [read post]
19 Mar 2012, 11:34 am
How many know that this is the direct result of the Court’s 5-4 decision in Citizens United v. [read post]
1 Apr 2019, 7:45 pm
Continuous Diligence Not Required Although the United States has been a first-inventor-to-file patent system since March 16th 2013, the patents of the previous first-to-invent system will linger for many years to come. [read post]
15 Oct 2007, 8:32 am
Life Insurance Company of North America, is an interesting example of this type of case, and reflects two particular points: first, the continuing influence in this area of the law of the First Circuit’s 1990 decision in Wickman v. [read post]
6 Jun 2021, 5:48 am
United States, a case with major implications for the future of the Computer Frauds and Abuses Act. [read post]
11 Sep 2007, 8:10 am
United States v. [read post]
28 Jun 2019, 11:32 am
Justin Riemer is Chief Counsel of the Republican National Committee, which filed an amicus brief in support of the state in Rucho v. [read post]
24 Sep 2007, 12:22 pm
In particular, public wrath is displayed against those who would challenge "age of consent" laws, which are higher in the United States (now effectively 18 in all states due to Federal statutes) than in most other societies. [read post]
1 Jul 2014, 1:37 pm
[iii] Citizens United v. [read post]
