Search for: "United States v. Burden"
Results 3101 - 3120
of 9,858
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Oct 2011, 3:03 am
Kuruwa and Arguelles departed from the United States in July 2009, though they later returned. [read post]
16 Jan 2019, 12:05 pm
Section 1331 gives federal courts jurisdiction over "civil actions arising under the Constitution, laws, or treaties of the United States. [read post]
31 Jan 2013, 12:11 pm
AJZN, Inc. v. [read post]
31 Jan 2013, 12:11 pm
AJZN, Inc. v. [read post]
8 Jun 2022, 7:39 am
Co. v. [read post]
8 Jun 2022, 7:39 am
Co. v. [read post]
6 Mar 2013, 5:54 pm
He began by reminding the Court of its 2009 decision in Northwest Austin Municipal Utilities District No. 1 v. [read post]
11 Dec 2013, 7:55 pm
Procedural HistoryOn January 21, 2010, Galderma sued Tolmar in the United States District Court for the District of Delaware, alleging that Tolmar’s ANDA product infringed certain claims of the ’377 patent. [read post]
15 Jan 2014, 11:15 am
Kisano Trade & Invest Ltd. v. [read post]
25 Nov 2015, 6:41 am
The indictment charged them with one count of conspiracy to defraud the United States, in violation of 18 U.S. [read post]
12 Jun 2015, 9:35 am
On Monday, June 1, 2015, the United States Supreme Court reversed a judgment of the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit which had granted Abercrombie & Fitch (“Abercrombie”) summary judgment in a religious accommodation case brought by a job applicant who wore a headscarf (a hijab) to an interview, but did not mention her religion or request an exception to Abercrombie’s dress code. [read post]
12 Jun 2015, 11:45 am
On Monday, June 1, 2015, the United States Supreme Court reversed a judgment of the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit which had granted Abercrombie & Fitch (“Abercrombie”) summary judgment in a religious accommodation case brought by a job applicant who wore a headscarf (a hijab) to an interview, but did not mention her religion or request an exception to Abercrombie’s dress code. [read post]
10 Feb 2007, 3:59 am
If the interested person seeks the prior option, the agency must refer the request to the applicable United States Attorney, who then files a complaint for forfeiture in federal district court, per 18 U.S.C. [read post]
2 Jun 2010, 12:21 pm
"Thus the decision to confess before trial amounts in effect to a waiver of the right to require the state at trial to meet its heavy burden of proof. [read post]
12 Oct 2016, 10:42 am
United States Army Corps of Engineers News Bulletinhttp://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/news/currentnews.html In the Land & Water section, we feature a story about a law passed by Congress to restore land to several tribes in Nevada. [read post]
7 Jun 2010, 3:49 pm
This must not be an impossible or disproportionate burden. [read post]
7 Jun 2010, 3:49 pm
This must not be an impossible or disproportionate burden. [read post]
6 Jul 2022, 2:25 pm
[An interesting threats case, from the Louisiana Court of Appeal] From Terrell v. [read post]
26 May 2021, 3:26 pm
Daly (Tribal Sovereign Immunity; Religious Land Use and Institutionalized Persons Act)United States, Osage Minerals Council v. [read post]
17 Nov 2008, 8:57 am
Co. v Graham, 275 AD2d 1012, 1013; see generally Thrasher v United States Liab. [read post]
