Search for: "United States v. Holder"
Results 3101 - 3120
of 4,280
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Jul 2014, 9:33 am
"The IPKat will continue to monitor the situation, rather suspecting that trade mark expert, American sports-lover and blog team member Neil will feel tempted to write something on it when the moment is ripe.Another curiosity from the United States may be perused in this Daily Mail article, "New Jersey sues Florida pizza shop 1,300 miles away because logo is 'too similar' to Garden State Parkway", via a tip-off from Chris… [read post]
25 Mar 2015, 4:59 am
Maine Springs, LLC v. [read post]
23 Aug 2012, 7:47 am
United States (2012), Mayo Collaborative Servs. v. [read post]
21 Mar 2017, 10:04 pm
State of Cal., 811 F. [read post]
15 Nov 2011, 5:32 am
The first-sale doctrine is a limitation on copyright that was recognized by the Supreme Court of the United States in 1908 (see Bobbs-Merrill Co. v. [read post]
6 Mar 2012, 1:10 am
United States, 690 F.2d 1368, 1370 (Fed. [read post]
28 Sep 2011, 7:10 am
One v. [read post]
15 Nov 2011, 5:32 am
The first-sale doctrine is a limitation on copyright that was recognized by the Supreme Court of the United States in 1908 (see Bobbs-Merrill Co. v. [read post]
22 Aug 2006, 1:42 pm
This may be a case of throwing the baby out with the bath water as it will open the field for everyone to partially develop inventions in the United States, ship the components abroad, assemble them, and sell them in foreign countries without fear of infringement suits in those countries. [read post]
15 Nov 2011, 5:32 am
The first-sale doctrine is a limitation on copyright that was recognized by the Supreme Court of the United States in 1908 (see Bobbs-Merrill Co. v. [read post]
12 Aug 2012, 10:24 pm
” Summit Petroleum Corp. v. [read post]
16 Aug 2018, 9:06 am
” In other words, he thought Sure-Tan required the court to reconcile the NLRA and immigration law by excluding from NLRA coverage anyone who could not legally be hired in the United States. [read post]
8 Apr 2010, 4:25 am
PAUL, WEISS, RIFKIND, WHARTON & GARRISON, L.L.P., No 09 Civ. 5593 (RJS)UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK;2010 U.S. [read post]
17 Dec 2010, 3:34 am
UK Ltd (IPKat) (1709 Blog) General Court find ‘iLink’ descriptive: Ilink Kommunikationssysteme v OHIM (ilink) (Class 46) Germany Federal Patent Court : Victory for patent holder in Highpoint v E-Plus, Ericsson and Nokia Siemens Networks (EPLAW) France More trouble for Google from the French (Likelihood of Confusion) Japan Apple accused of selling pirate books on app store (TorrentFreak) Netherlands MPAA and colleagues s in Netherlands shuts down 29 BitTorrent… [read post]
6 Jan 2012, 9:02 pm
Perez (11-713), on redistricting the state house, Perry v. [read post]
8 Aug 2011, 8:04 am
Holder, and HHS v. [read post]
21 Jul 2016, 1:54 pm
After all, there are very few courts of equity left in the United States. [read post]
15 Oct 2020, 12:44 pm
” Decommissioning liability for RUE holders: Current regulations – BSEE regulations are currently silent concerning decommissioning liability for RUE holders. [read post]
14 Aug 2019, 7:32 am
Com’rs of Brevard Cnty. v. [read post]
28 Oct 2009, 4:44 pm
The new Sec. 1041 provides that the Defense Secretary “may not use any of the amounts authorized” in the new law ”"or otherwise available to the Department of Defense to release into the United States, its territories, or possessions, any individual…who is not a citizen of the United States, and is in the custody or under the effective control of the Department of Defense, or otherwise under… [read post]
