Search for: "Wells v. Justice Court"
Results 3101 - 3120
of 29,119
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Oct 2008, 10:04 am
Her appeal to the circuit judge was refused, and she appealed to the Court of Appeal.The Decision: Lord Justice Thorpe dealt quite summarily with the remarriage trap point, which had been raised by the circuit judge, who was concerned that she was seeking an order against herself. [read post]
23 Nov 2010, 12:39 pm
Which is, again, true, but also cuts the other way as well. [read post]
8 Nov 2011, 7:39 pm
Acknowledging the benefits often realized through ADR, as well as the overarching goal of justice systems to facilitate justice, she concludes that: “ADR is here to stay, and that is a good thing. [read post]
12 Dec 2013, 2:03 am
Building on the state high court's recent decision in Commonwealth v. [read post]
27 Sep 2021, 12:29 pm
The Court denied the application for injunctive relief in Whole Woman’s Health v. [read post]
16 Jun 2014, 3:57 pm
Clark v. [read post]
20 Jun 2007, 11:59 am
State of Indiana, a 4-page, 5-0 opinion, Justice Boehm concludes:For the reasons explained in Gutermuth v. [read post]
28 Feb 2014, 1:27 pm
Predictably enough, Justice Ginsburg asked him why the Patent Act provision on fees should be interpreted differently from the identically worded Lanham Act provision – referring to the Noxell Corp. v. [read post]
21 Oct 2019, 12:41 pm
Huawei v. [read post]
18 May 2009, 9:19 am
Supreme Court's decision today in Ashcroft v. [read post]
3 Dec 2015, 9:01 pm
Indeed, the Supreme Court in Vieth v. [read post]
30 Oct 2020, 11:15 am
This week in Other Barks & Bites: the Federal Circuit reverses a lower court’s erroneous application of the first-to-file rule in denying a motion to transfer venue in a patent case, and also finds standing for parties bringing a statutory cause of action for trademark cancellation proceedings; the USPTO issues trademark examiner guidance following the Supreme Court’s ruling in USPTO v. [read post]
19 Nov 2014, 10:43 am
You don't need me saying five dozen times that this justice writes especially well because, well, it's self-evident. [read post]
21 Mar 2025, 12:15 pm
Last time, ChatGPT mistakenly claimed that Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg dissented in Obergefell v. [read post]
6 Aug 2024, 2:50 pm
The trial court could well have gone the other way. [read post]
8 Aug 2018, 1:51 pm
The following figure looks at the number of cases the justices heard across the 2015 through 2017 terms that contained pro- and anti-business interests as well as the percentage of these decisions that were pro-business. [read post]
11 Nov 2024, 7:50 am
The case, Seven County Infrastructure Coalition v. [read post]
15 Oct 2018, 1:00 am
Wells v Devani, heard 11 Oct 2018. [read post]
25 Jan 2013, 8:00 am
Inland Empire Patient's Health and Wellness Center, is slated to go before the court Feb. 5. [read post]
23 Feb 2024, 7:30 am
Though Robert notes that he began working on the book 35 years ago (xxv), he has borne that burden well. [read post]
