Search for: "Will v. United States" Results 3101 - 3120 of 91,956
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Jun 2016, 4:43 am by Immigration Prof
At Notice & Comment, David Rubenstein and Pratheepan Gulasekaram explain how states might challenge executive nonenforcement policies in the posture of defendants—what they call “ex post judicial review”—and suggest what this alternative route could entail for questions of standing, separation... [read post]
2 Jun 2008, 4:21 am
Santos ran an illegal lottery, from which he paid runners a commission, salary to collectors, and winnings to bettors. [read post]
24 Jun 2008, 11:12 am by Paul M. Rashkind
Greenlaw filed a direct appeal of his sentence; the government did not appeal the district court’s failure to make two sentences under 18 U.S.C. [read post]
29 Apr 2009, 3:23 pm by Paul M. Rashkind
Dean’s gun accidentally discharged during a bank robbery, but no one was harmed. [read post]
2 Jun 2015, 2:49 am by NCC Staff
The committee said it was clear, to it, that “the 14th amendment to the Constitution has no effect whatever upon the status of the Indian tribes within the limits of the United States,” but that “straggling Indians” were subject to the jurisdiction of the United States. [read post]
10 Jan 2008, 9:01 pm
The comment thread in my post on next week's oral argument in Virginia v. [read post]
1 Jul 2012, 11:01 pm by Orin Kerr
The delay question came up in passing in Footnote 3 of United States v. [read post]
3 Dec 2008, 5:38 am
Dudas to the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit. [read post]
19 Feb 2018, 2:21 am by Michael DelSignore
 His client appealed to the United States Supreme Court arguing that a lawyer cannot concede guilty over his clear objection. [read post]
19 Feb 2018, 2:21 am by Michael DelSignore
 His client appealed to the United States Supreme Court arguing that a lawyer cannot concede guilty over his clear objection. [read post]
3 Oct 2007, 6:09 am
(SCOTUSwiki) At 11 a.m., the Court is scheduled to hear argument in United States v. [read post]