Search for: "Williams v. Justice Court" Results 3101 - 3120 of 5,965
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Mar 2020, 6:24 am by Jackie McDermott
Russo, the first major abortion case the Court has heard since 2016, and Seila Law LLC v. [read post]
9 Apr 2009, 2:12 pm
This edition of "Petitions to Watch" features cases up for consideration at the Justices' private conference on April 17. [read post]
27 Sep 2011, 6:44 am by Nabiha Syed
Lawrence Hurley of Greenwire previews one of the environmental cases on the Court’s docket, PPL Montana, LLC v. [read post]
7 Aug 2023, 6:30 am by ernst
Supreme Court during the Court’s 1953-54 Term and was in the courtroom on May 17, 1954, when Chief Justice Warren read the unanimous decision in Brown v. [read post]
11 May 2010, 7:30 pm by Anna Christensen
Daniel Solove comments on the Supreme Court confirmation process more generally at Concurring Opinions, calling for term limits for Supreme Court Justices. [read post]
2 Apr 2012, 7:53 am by emagraken
 In assessing non-pecuniary damages at $27,000 Madam Justice Maisonville provided the following reasons: [69] The Court must assess damages for injury to the plaintiff. [read post]
28 Sep 2023, 4:00 am by Anil Kalhan
Ultimately, of course, the Supreme Court vacated the Trump administration’s rescission of DACA in 2020 when—by a 5-4 margin, with Chief Justice John Roberts writing for the majority—it decided Department of Homeland Security v. [read post]
25 Jul 2010, 12:10 pm by David Smith
The background to these protests was set out by Mr Justice Griffith Williams in his original High Court judgement which was the subject of this appeal. 3. [read post]
25 Jul 2010, 12:10 pm by David Smith
The background to these protests was set out by Mr Justice Griffith Williams in his original High Court judgement which was the subject of this appeal. 3. [read post]
29 Oct 2009, 11:11 am
Williams Issue: Whether a district court abuses its discretion by going beyond the allegations in the complaint and examining the factual record to determine whether the named plaintiffs have satisfied the class certification requirements of Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 23. [read post]
The three-judge panel there held that, in light of the Supreme Court’s decision last summer in United States v. [read post]