Search for: "owner" Results 3101 - 3120 of 148,454
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Oct 2014, 8:20 am
A Cincinnati condo owner is down 30-love in tennis court controversy after the First District Court of Appeals upheld a decision favoring the condominium owners’ association. [read post]
12 Dec 2006, 5:25 am
We can imagine instances when imposing the requirement of additional (cumulative) testimony by the intended occupant--like a minor or unborn child--would present undue hardship or effectively negate an owner's ability to commence an owner's-use case. [read post]
24 Feb 2016, 9:03 am by taotiadmin
., a Pennsylvania-based company, and three other related companies, agreed to settle a qui tam… The post Four Pennsylvania-based Companies and Owners Settle Customs and Shipping Fraud Lawsuit for $3 Million; Plead Guilty to Related Criminal Charges appeared first on TZ Legal - Fraud Fighters. [read post]
5 Sep 2017, 7:19 am by Ernest Wagner
§ 1024.36(d)(2)(i)(A)) by failing to provide the loan owner’s phone number in response to a borrower’s request for information […] Ernest Wagner [read post]
24 Jan 2022, 8:43 am by Gail Lamarche
Bevis, 322 So. 3d 167 […] The post Right to Bear Arms: Florida’s Second District Court of Appeal Holds in Favor of Gun Owner in Temporary Injunction Case appeared first on Henderson, Franklin, Starnes & Holt, P.A.. [read post]
11 Jun 2011, 10:28 pm
"What are the rules in California regarding HOA Board members not being actual owners? [read post]
12 Mar 2010, 2:49 pm by Kevin L. Britt
The Washington Court of Appeals filed an unpublished opinion last week in a case about the scope of a homeowners association’s power to assess owners. [read post]
9 Oct 2012, 6:38 am by Helena Tiernay
 Owner-employees will also be required to give 16 weeks’ notice of their return from maternity leave, rather than the current 8 weeks.The new ‘owner-employee’ status will be optional for existing employees, but new employees may be required to enter into this type of contract. [read post]
6 Dec 2011, 9:39 am by Maya Risman
Serious fault lies with the bar/club/lounge owner.  [read post]
6 Dec 2011, 9:39 am by Maya Risman
  Serious fault lies with the bar/club/lounge owner. [read post]
14 Sep 2021, 10:35 am by An Nguyen
There are compliance cases where owners have been relieved from paying costs or cost awards reduced because the corporation did not inform owners of misconduct early or did not supply full particulars to the owner to take appropriate steps. [read post]
15 Jan 2008, 10:33 am
So even though Ford has a lineup of enthusiasts who want to show off their Ford cars, the company is bent on alienating them. 'Them' being some of the most loyal owners and future buyers that they have. [read post]
22 Aug 2023, 12:30 pm by Alec Pronk
On August 18, the owner of the APPLE JAZZ trademark filed an opposition to Apple’s motion to amend its trademark application for the mark APPLE MUSIC with the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board (TTAB). [read post]
13 Nov 2024, 10:22 am by Eileen McDermott
The Court of Appeal's decision had come as a relief to trademark applicants and owners whose registrations included broad specifications in the UK, but today’s decision revives uncertainty and has been dubbed a “shock” ruling by UK legal media. [read post]
21 Oct 2024, 4:15 am by Eileen McDermott
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (CAFC) on Friday, October 18, issued a precedential decision holding in part that claim construction is not categorically forbidden at the Rule 12(b)(6) stage of a case, but ultimately vacating-in-part a district court’s dismissal of a patent owner’s infringement suit. [read post]
23 Nov 2015, 9:00 am
., Board Certified by The Florida Bar in Health Law Former owners of a health maintenance organization (HMO), Haider Ali Khan and Sabiha Haider Khan, recently filed suit in Florida federal court against BankUnited Inc. and its acquired New York-based Herald National Bank. [read post]
21 Oct 2024, 4:15 am by Eileen McDermott
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (CAFC) on Friday, October 18, issued a precedential decision holding in part that claim construction is not categorically forbidden at the Rule 12(b)(6) stage of a case, but ultimately vacating-in-part a district court’s dismissal of a patent owner’s infringement suit. [read post]