Search for: "AT&T"
Results 3121 - 3140
of 881,839
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Jul 2010, 3:02 pm
One of the easiest ways to fail paper A of the EQE is to write a “wish claim”. [read post]
8 Nov 2010, 3:00 pm
A little bonus especially for my American readers, who now rank third (!) [read post]
26 Mar 2011, 12:01 pm
Independent claim 1 of the main request read: An uncoated nanocomposite dense sintered silicon carbonitride ceramic cutting tool, obtainable by cold pressing a spray-dried flowable granulate of a nanosized powder of ? [read post]
20 Dec 2020, 9:51 pm
In my first post on the "Study on Directors' Duties and Sustainable Corporate Governance" ("Study on Directors' Duties") prepared by Ernst & Young for the European Commission, I said that corporate boards are free to apply a purposive approach to... [read post]
14 Jan 2010, 3:03 pm
In this case the Opposition Division (OD) maintained the patent in amended form. [read post]
21 Apr 2010, 3:01 pm
If in a patent as granted one of the dependent claims cannot be combined in a meaningful way with the main claim, is this a matter of clarity ? [read post]
15 Aug 2010, 3:01 pm
During the appeal proceedings, the question arose as to the exact date at which document D19 was made available to the public. [read post]
16 Feb 2013, 11:01 am
In this appeal against the revocation of the opposed patent the Board – as so often – found late filed requests to be inadmissible:*** Translation of the German original ***[1.3] In the present case the Opposition Division (OD) had informed the [patent proprietor] before the oral proceedings (OPs) that it agreed with the opinion of the opponent according to which the main request of October 14, 2009, as well as the auxiliary request filed on the same day (and having the same claim 1) was… [read post]
12 Jan 2013, 11:01 am
This is an examination appeal; the Examining Division (ED) had refused the application for lack of inventive step.Claim 1 of the second auxiliary request before the Board read:A display control apparatus for controlling display of information, the apparatus comprising: a display control means for displaying, on a display device (24), a cursor (Cur-1) movable by a user and link parts (a-d) to items of information; a selecting means (12) for selecting one of said items of information based on a link… [read post]
30 Jun 2011, 3:01 pm
After its application had been refused by the Examining Division, in a decision posted on December 8, 2009, the representative of the (American) applicant filed a notice of appeal, together with a request for re-establishment, on March 22, 2010. [read post]
26 Dec 2009, 10:24 am
The examples of [document] D1 as such do not indicate that the polyisobutene dispersants have functionalities of "greater than 1.3" as required in present claim 1. [read post]
17 Aug 2010, 3:01 pm
[2.1] The patent in suit claims two priority dates, the first priority date being that of US 558 346 of 26 July 1990, the second priority being that of US 681 565 of 5 April 1991. [read post]
3 Sep 2013, 5:01 pm
I may be wrong but I think there is some tension between G 1/03 and G 2/10. [read post]
2 Feb 2010, 3:03 pm
I find this case interesting because the applicant found a clever way to overcome a novelty objection; unfortunately, this goal was achieved by using an effect that turned out to be an obvious bonus effect. [read post]
14 Mar 2010, 4:02 pm
It is well known that the reference signs in claims are not to be construed as limiting the claims (R 43(7)). [read post]
5 Jun 2010, 11:02 am
[5.1] Document D6 is concerned with laser-glazing of a binary eutectic Fe83B17 alloy. [read post]
6 Aug 2011, 11:01 am
It is true that amendments of the description can sometimes lead to inadmissible extensions of a patent, in particular when the amendments concern statements with respect to the prior art. [read post]
29 Apr 2021, 9:00 pm
If you have purchased car insurance, then you probably expect it to pay out when you are involved in a car accident. [read post]
16 Feb 2012, 6:00 am
Recibi una hoja del Despacho CEPCN, en donde me requieren el 10% ( 11,755.00) de mi deuda con Banorte para el dia 20 de febrero, en donde dice multiples explicaciones y amenazas por la omision al pago de la deuda, quisiera saber si realizando este pago me dejan de notificar, (No cuento con la cantidad que me piden) por lo que solicito su valiosa ayuda para tener un panorama mas amplio de como debo proceder, les agradezco mucho su oportuna informacion ya que el pago se tendria que realizar el ... [read post]
14 Nov 2010, 3:01 pm
The present decision comprises some interesting statements on an affidavit which was filed by the applicant whose application had been refused, in order to establish sufficiency of disclosure (click to enlarge):(Click to enlarge)The Board does not consider this document persuasive:[7.1] With respect to the signed affidavit […] referred to by the appellant as “Annex 4” the following observations are made. [7.2] In the board’s communication, it was noted that when assessing… [read post]
