Search for: "BAKER v BAKER" Results 3121 - 3140 of 4,848
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Oct 2011, 2:24 am
A copyright debate: "Is NLA v Meltwater the end of browsing? [read post]
25 Oct 2011, 6:11 pm
The divestitures are intended to remedy the Justice Department’s antitrust concerns.The complaint and proposed consent decree in U.S. v. [read post]
24 Oct 2011, 4:51 pm by Colin O'Keefe
The biggest story of the last few days comes courtesy of our privacy law bloggers, as we've seen a flurry of conversation from them on Anderson v. [read post]
24 Oct 2011, 7:41 am by Joshua Matz
  At ACSblog, Marco Simons discusses Kiobel v. [read post]
24 Oct 2011, 12:02 am by Melina Padron
 The review panel was composed of three independent lawyers: Rt Hon Sir Scott Baker, David Perry QC and Anand Doobay. [read post]
22 Oct 2011, 1:19 pm by 1 Crown Office Row
Click here for FTI’s full briefing on Sir Scott Baker’s Extradition Review. [read post]
19 Oct 2011, 5:31 am by JB
A hundred and twenty years later, the Warren Court flirted with the revival of the Guarantee Clause in the famous apportionment cases, Baker v. [read post]
15 Oct 2011, 4:43 am by Mandelman
  So, plotting data on a ‘V” shaped model but having it turn out to be a different letter of  the alphabet, is a like drawing the route New Jersey on a map of Australia. [read post]
14 Oct 2011, 9:23 am by Dave
  Section 122, Housing Act 1996 enables an order to be made which makes different provision for different/ areas/classes of case/cases but there is no requirement for such differences, and no express requirement for HB to be set at a level that fully covers any claimant’s actual housing costs in any area.Grounds 2 and 3 were taken together as in sum they concern the (well-travelled) territory of “due regard” to the need to eliminate discrimination and promote equality on which… [read post]
14 Oct 2011, 9:23 am by Dave
  Section 122, Housing Act 1996 enables an order to be made which makes different provision for different/ areas/classes of case/cases but there is no requirement for such differences, and no express requirement for HB to be set at a level that fully covers any claimant’s actual housing costs in any area.Grounds 2 and 3 were taken together as in sum they concern the (well-travelled) territory of “due regard” to the need to eliminate discrimination and promote equality on which… [read post]
13 Oct 2011, 10:24 pm by Walter Olson
HHS doesn’t think you’re sophisticated enough to handle that freedom [Stewart Baker] Uh-oh: some New York lawmakers want “a more refined First Amendment” [Slashdot, Lucy Steigerwald] Wal-Mart v. [read post]