Search for: "Bear v. State"
Results 3121 - 3140
of 14,844
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Jul 2020, 7:00 am
It is also manifest in the substance of his opinions, as evidenced by what he wrote in United States v. [read post]
21 Jul 2020, 4:00 am
" Tthe court pointed out that in New York State Correctional Officers and Police Benevolent Association v State of New York, 94 NY2d 321, the Court of Appeals stated that "courts will not assume the role of overseers to conform the award to their sense of justice. [read post]
21 Jul 2020, 12:00 am
" Tthe court pointed out that in New York State Correctional Officers and Police Benevolent Association v State of New York, 94 NY2d 321, the Court of Appeals stated that "courts will not assume the role of overseers to conform the award to their sense of justice. [read post]
20 Jul 2020, 11:03 am
., v. [read post]
20 Jul 2020, 6:30 am
” Take, for example, his statement that Burwell v. [read post]
20 Jul 2020, 3:48 am
[¶] No actual corporate benefit has been stated and there is no evidence that proper judgment was exercised either. [read post]
19 Jul 2020, 8:41 am
United States v. [read post]
17 Jul 2020, 8:31 am
From Edward Snowden to Luxembourg The case, Data Protection Commissioner v. [read post]
17 Jul 2020, 4:00 am
This distinct aspect of research has a bearing on the author’s “moral rights” in Canadian law. [read post]
16 Jul 2020, 9:01 pm
In Part One of this series, I explained why last week’s opinions in Chiafalo v. [read post]
16 Jul 2020, 7:28 pm
” That said, pursuant to the CJEU’s decision, organizations can no longer rely on the Privacy Shield framework to cover transfers of EU personal data to the United States. [read post]
16 Jul 2020, 12:58 pm
U.S. asylum officers are in the main dedicated and capable, but judicial review of asylum decisions at the U.S. border is exceedingly limited—limits that the Supreme Court upheld on June 25 in Department of Homeland Security v. [read post]
16 Jul 2020, 9:17 am
The destination state may, for example, have an ‘adequacy decision’ that means that the state in question ensures an adequate (roughly equivalent) level of protection to the ensured by the GDPR (Article 45 GDPR). [read post]
16 Jul 2020, 6:33 am
Jones v. [read post]
16 Jul 2020, 1:30 am
Officer appealed.The Appellate Division, citing Matter of Messenger v State of New York Dept. of Corr. [read post]
16 Jul 2020, 1:30 am
Officer appealed.The Appellate Division, citing Matter of Messenger v State of New York Dept. of Corr. [read post]
15 Jul 2020, 1:53 pm
United States and Trumbo v. [read post]
15 Jul 2020, 7:04 am
Hardison, which stated that employers suffer an “undue hardship” in accommodating an employee’s religious exercise whenever doing so would require them “to bear more than a de minimis cost,” misinterprets 42 U.S.C. [read post]
15 Jul 2020, 6:30 am
Finally, it bears noting that the pace of resolving these questions is likely to accelerate. [read post]
15 Jul 2020, 3:23 am
The IP Watchdog gave an overview of the relevant principles non-profit organisations should bear in mind to avoid consumer confusion.The Kluwer Trademark Blog discussed whether descriptive terms in languages which do not hold official EU language status might still be deemed to give rise to a likelihood of confusion where there is nevertheless a significant population in at least one EU Member State which speaks that language - whether that is Russian in Germany or the Baltic… [read post]
