Search for: "California State Bar Court"
Results 3121 - 3140
of 11,179
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Apr 2011, 3:42 pm
To its credit, the United States District Court for the Central District of California dismissed the 2005 class action lawsuit which alleged that Match.com "secretly employs people as 'date bait' to send bogus enticing E-mails and to go on as many as 100 dates a month - or three a day - to keep customers ponying up. [read post]
25 Feb 2016, 5:34 pm
WHEN: Monday, February 29, 2016, 9:30 a.m. to 11:30 a.m.WHERE: Court of Appeal Courtroom, Ronald Reagan State Building, North Tower, Third Floor, 300 South Spring Street, Los AngelesWHAT: ACE is co-sponsored by the Court of Appeal, Second Appellate District, the Constitutional Rights Foundation (CRF), the Los Angeles County Bar Association’s Appellate Courts… [read post]
13 Nov 2017, 10:53 am
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, in refusing last year to bar the state law from going into effect, did not apply that strong test. [read post]
1 Jun 2012, 1:25 pm
Moreover, it continues, “[f]urther proceedings on remand . . . may provide an independent bar to petitioners’ claims. [read post]
3 Feb 2017, 12:02 pm
Because of the tradition of senatorial courtesy with lower federal court appointments, even Democratic-appointed federal judges skew conservative in red states with Republican U.S. senators; the same phenomenon is seen in reverse in deep blue states. [read post]
4 Mar 2021, 5:22 pm
Some guidance will hopefully be forthcoming on that front in the not-too-distant future from the California Supreme Court. [read post]
18 Mar 2008, 9:01 pm
Brown (06-939), involving whether states may bar employers from using public money to influence the outcome of union organizing campaigns. [read post]
4 Aug 2020, 8:03 pm
Regents of the University of California While this is not strictly an employment law case, it will have a big impact on employment. [read post]
10 Dec 2017, 7:33 am
It also refused to hear related state claims.In Hunter v. [read post]
8 Mar 2012, 7:46 am
The California state Supreme Court is set to decide whether to deny an applicant, Sergio Garcia, a law license solely on the basis of his immigration status. [read post]
10 Oct 2014, 5:42 am
Rptr. 838 (California Court of Appeals 1998). [read post]
19 Oct 2017, 5:00 am
According to the US Attorney’s Office, the woman used the identity and bar license number of a California attorney. [read post]
16 Jun 2011, 11:58 am
For example, if the district court decision were permitted to stand as issued, it could affect the exempt status of recent medical school graduates working as residents in hospitals and also first-year associates working at a law firm before receiving their bar results, as well as seasoned attorneys licensed in another state but working in California on a corporate deal or an ongoing lawsuit. [read post]
26 Dec 2012, 4:41 pm
In Matthews, the federal court recognized the right of out of state NFL players to file injury claims in California. [read post]
23 Aug 2016, 4:00 am
The third participating jurisdiction, California– a mandatory Bar–lauded the program and resisted its demise. [read post]
6 Nov 2007, 2:32 pm
The court also affirmed the finding that the use of "Perfume Bay" was not likely to cause confusion, in part because "PerfumeBay" incorporates the full "eBay" trademark, whereas "Perfume Bay," with the addition of the space between the words, no longer incorporates the whole eBay trademark.The Ninth Circuit reversed the district court's finding of no likely dilution under California… [read post]
13 Apr 2020, 6:47 am
— The Texas Tribune Texas Supreme Court stays lower court ruling, temporarily reviving Gov. [read post]
9 Aug 2009, 2:03 pm
"The materials for this article were obtained from various sources including Yahoo News, Wikipedia, Washington State Bar Association, Cornell University Law School, and About.com. [read post]
24 Apr 2017, 7:23 am
One of the state courts agreed. [read post]
16 Jun 2020, 6:00 am
Sessions argues that the California Values Act defies a 1996 federal law that bars state and local governments from prohibiting the exchange of "information regarding" an individual's immigration status. [read post]
