Search for: "California v. Texas" Results 3121 - 3140 of 4,429
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 May 2010, 8:53 am by INFORRM
Eric Goldman’s Technology and Marketing blog has an interesting post about the decision of the Texas Appeal Court in Milo v. [read post]
16 Nov 2009, 4:51 am
(Class 99)   United States US General Wisconsin judge vacates $ 1.26 billion judgment in default against PepsiCo (IPKat) (IP Factor) California Court of Appeal: Von Dutch tradename settlement gives rise to legal malpractice action and questionable mediation confidentiality decision: Michael Cassel v Superior Court of Los Angeles County (The IP ADR Blog)   US Patent Reform Putting the USPTO to work for independent inventors (Director's Forum) (Inventive Step) (IP… [read post]
16 Nov 2009, 4:51 am
(Class 99) United States US General Wisconsin judge vacates $ 1.26 billion judgment in default against PepsiCo (IPKat) (IP Factor) California Court of Appeal: Von Dutch tradename settlement gives rise to legal malpractice action and questionable mediation confidentiality decision: Michael Cassel v Superior Court of Los Angeles County (The IP ADR Blog) US Patent Reform Putting the USPTO to work for independent inventors (Director's Forum) (Inventive Step) (IP Asset Maximizer… [read post]
16 Nov 2009, 4:51 am
(Class 99) United States US General Wisconsin judge vacates $ 1.26 billion judgment in default against PepsiCo (IPKat) (IP Factor) California Court of Appeal: Von Dutch tradename settlement gives rise to legal malpractice action and questionable mediation confidentiality decision: Michael Cassel v Superior Court of Los Angeles County (The IP ADR Blog) US Patent Reform Putting the USPTO to work for independent inventors (Director's Forum) (Inventive Step) (IP Asset Maximizer… [read post]
6 Jan 2012, 11:57 am
Two men, named Harris and Miller, were involved in some drug transactions between Texas and California. [read post]
15 Nov 2007, 10:15 pm
Ted Frank has a good round up of analysis on the potential problems spots at Point of Law; And Howard Erichson reports on a plaintiffs-only conference to discuss the settlement;From the miscellaneous category: New York State practitioners should take note of a reversal in Raffellini v. [read post]
5 Jan 2015, 1:17 pm by Lyle Denniston
In the wave of court rulings following the Supreme Court’s July 2013 ruling in United States v. [read post]
14 Mar 2014, 5:59 pm by Lyle Denniston
So far, no federal court of appeals has issued a final ruling on the issue since the Supreme Court’s decision last June, in United States v. [read post]