Search for: "Chambers v. State"
Results 3121 - 3140
of 4,896
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Dec 2013, 9:06 pm
The cases are EPA v. [read post]
22 Dec 2011, 7:27 am
In this case, the Grand Chamber clarified that in order to have ‘directed activity’ an intention on the part of the trader to target his activity towards a certain Member State is required. [read post]
21 Dec 2020, 9:47 am
The landmark Supreme Court ruling Roe v. [read post]
28 May 2009, 6:50 pm
Chambers. [read post]
6 Feb 2012, 2:30 am
As noted below, the Administrative Court will hear the appeal in the case of R (Chambers) v DPP on Wednesday. [read post]
13 Feb 2024, 2:40 am
More precisely Article 7 (2) of the Brussels Ia Regulation had to be interpreted, according to which a person domiciled in a Member State may be sued in another Member State, ‘in matters relating to tort, delict or quasi-delict, in the courts for the place where the harmful event occurred or may occur’. [read post]
28 May 2008, 11:21 am
Circuit) Petition for certiorari Brief in opposition Petitioner's reply Brief amicus curiae of the United States (recommending denial of certiorari) __________________ Docket: 07-539 Case name: Progress Energy, Inc. v. [read post]
31 May 2011, 12:19 am
Article 9 breached – see this case note from Garden Court North chambers Sultan of Pahang, R (on the application of) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2011] EWCA Civ 616 (25 May 2011): Sultan of Pahang not entitled to diplomatic immunity as Pahang is sultanate of Malaysia, not a state for purpose of immigration rules. [read post]
2 Sep 2023, 11:21 pm
The most recent example is the Grand Chamber case of S, V and A v Denmark [GC], nos. 35553/12 and 2 others, 22 October 2018. [read post]
29 Jun 2014, 4:00 am
Hughes v. [read post]
2 Jul 2009, 8:00 am
As for the Blasius doctrine, the decision in Portnoy v. [read post]
8 Dec 2017, 4:16 pm
United States v. [read post]
9 May 2024, 7:29 am
Federal Trade Commission, 3:24-cv-986, United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas, filed April 23, 2024; Chamber of Commerce for the United States of America et al. v. [read post]
29 Jun 2007, 8:03 am
" The new order did not state what changes had come about since the denial in April. [read post]
3 Jan 2022, 5:30 am
He modified things a bit by saying that because the state had decided to allow private clerics into the execution chamber, the risk could not be zero, but it could be very close to zero. [read post]
28 Jan 2024, 8:39 am
McCall v. [read post]
8 Jun 2024, 6:50 pm
National Security Archive v. [read post]
3 May 2013, 6:11 am
Perry (the challenge to Proposition 8) and United States v. [read post]
6 Sep 2010, 1:55 am
” United States v. [read post]
6 Nov 2017, 4:09 pm
Darryl Hutcheon is a member of Matrix Chambers and an author of Online Publication Claims: a Practical Guide. [read post]
