Search for: "Character v. State"
Results 3121 - 3140
of 6,679
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Apr 2018, 1:17 pm
In our view, Local Law No. 3 was consistent with the Village’s comprehensive plan and was “calculated to benefit the community as a whole as opposed to benefitting individuals or a group of individuals” (Asian Ams. for Equality v Koch, 72 NY2d at 131; see Daniels v Van Voris, 241 AD2d 796, 798 [1997]). [read post]
12 Apr 2018, 1:17 pm
In our view, Local Law No. 3 was consistent with the Village’s comprehensive plan and was “calculated to benefit the community as a whole as opposed to benefitting individuals or a group of individuals” (Asian Ams. for Equality v Koch, 72 NY2d at 131; see Daniels v Van Voris, 241 AD2d 796, 798 [1997]). [read post]
4 Feb 2016, 6:40 am
The case is styled, Mutual Life Insurance Co. of Kentucky v. [read post]
29 Jun 2022, 12:41 pm
It is hosted by Völkerrechtsblog and brilliantly co-organized by Justine Batura (Völkerrechtsblog), Anna Sophia Tiedeke (Völkerrechtsblog) and Michael Riegner (University of Erfurt; co-founder of the Völkerrechtsblog), who will feature as guest editor of the Symposium. [read post]
15 Jun 2007, 4:31 pm
The state's appeal is in Quarterman v. [read post]
16 Mar 2011, 12:20 pm
And Senate President Thomas V. [read post]
13 Oct 2014, 9:00 pm
But I do not think that it stands with regards to the other variants that we will be exploring -- namely the experimental variant (aka 'Beijing Consensus v.2') and the state-capitalist variant (aka 'Beijing Consensus v.3'). [read post]
7 Jul 2024, 11:35 am
Parts II through V then consider in detail the text and interpretation of the substantive provisions of the UNGP. [read post]
17 Sep 2014, 9:31 am
Rankin v. [read post]
16 Jul 2021, 7:46 am
Advertising/E-Commerce * Ariix, LLC v. [read post]
7 Feb 2014, 7:40 am
Apple, Inc. v. [read post]
4 Nov 2010, 11:40 am
” If a majority of the Justices choose to side with the State of California and open the floodgates to a new era of speech regulation, I very much looking forward to seeing how they reconcile that with their decision last term in the controversial case of United States v. [read post]
1 Oct 2013, 5:53 pm
--Whitman v. [read post]
27 Jun 2010, 9:28 am
State v. [read post]
27 Jun 2010, 9:28 am
State v. [read post]
4 Mar 2014, 7:31 am
Other relevant factors include the nature and character of the statement, the relationship of the parties, State v. [read post]
11 Sep 2022, 1:45 pm
Homeless Charity v. [read post]
13 Dec 2023, 5:01 am
Holmes, III in Doe v. [read post]
28 Oct 2009, 2:57 pm
By Cori Badgley In Guggenheim v. [read post]
3 Jan 2013, 12:54 pm
Kent, 552 U.S. 440 (2007)—whether state statutory provisions that require a plaintiff to prove some version of fraud-on-the-FDA as a predicate to recovery on certain claims are preempted by Buckman Co. v. [read post]
