Search for: "Court v. Administrative Office"
Results 3121 - 3140
of 14,562
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Aug 2013, 1:03 pm
TEXAS ADJUTANT GENERAL'S OFFICE v. [read post]
26 Mar 2010, 9:34 am
I must write a quick commentary on the just-released judgment of the Supreme Court of Canada in R. v. [read post]
5 Sep 2023, 8:03 am
Four of the seven vacancies have nominees, according to the Administrative Office of the U.S. [read post]
22 Apr 2020, 1:13 pm
One of the powers the Act gave to the Supreme Court, writs of mandamus, was the subject of the famous Supreme Court case, Marbury v. [read post]
19 Jan 2023, 12:14 pm
Office of the Marshal Supreme Court of the United States Washington, D.C. 20543. [read post]
10 Oct 2016, 1:11 pm
Roberts v. [read post]
28 Jan 2014, 7:30 am
Should the Solicitor General’s office cut back on its participation in Supreme Court cases? [read post]
3 Jun 2019, 4:54 am
On June 12, 2019, the Supreme Court of Ohio will hear oral argument in David Ayers v. [read post]
16 Sep 2018, 10:36 pm
With a view to a Qualcomm v. [read post]
26 Jun 2023, 6:00 am
The Records Access Officer's decision was sustained in the administrative appeal that followed. [read post]
26 Jun 2023, 6:00 am
The Records Access Officer's decision was sustained in the administrative appeal that followed. [read post]
8 Jan 2010, 10:39 pm
One court takes a dim view of the viability of the exclusionary rule in civil forfeiture cases. [read post]
Navigating Fair Compensation in Closely Held Companies: The Legal Implications of Excessive Salaries
25 Feb 2024, 11:20 am
Another case, Kovac v. [read post]
31 Jul 2024, 5:06 am
Furthermore, he sets out a long-term agenda.The extreme conservatism of the Roberts Court--overruling Roe v. [read post]
29 Mar 2024, 2:02 pm
Because I believe the Supreme Court was right to rule against the administration in Biden v. [read post]
1 Feb 2008, 12:10 pm
In considering the convenience of the parties, the court looks at six factors: (i) proximity of creditors of every kind to the court, (ii) proximity of the debtor, (iii) proximity of witnesses necessary to the administration of the estate, (iv) location of the assets, (v) economic administration of the estate and (vi) necessity for ancillary administration if liquidation should result. [read post]
1 Feb 2008, 12:10 pm
In considering the convenience of the parties, the court looks at six factors: (i) proximity of creditors of every kind to the court, (ii) proximity of the debtor, (iii) proximity of witnesses necessary to the administration of the estate, (iv) location of the assets, (v) economic administration of the estate and (vi) necessity for ancillary administration if liquidation should result. [read post]
11 Feb 2020, 8:00 am
Zayed v. [read post]
28 Oct 2016, 8:00 am
People v. [read post]
