Search for: "Daily v. Daily"
Results 3121 - 3140
of 14,519
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Jul 2012, 7:49 am
.” Also be sure to check out the China Accounting Blog post “SEC v EDU: the end of VIEs? [read post]
6 Dec 2011, 1:59 am
If the impact of the new policy as a whole was considered it had been prospective, not retrospective, in its effect when enacted on 30 November 2000.” WLR Daily, 2nd December 2011 Source: www.iclr.co.uk [read post]
13 Oct 2015, 9:11 am
<> David Herr v. [read post]
2 Jun 2014, 8:59 am
<> National Environmental Dev v. [read post]
3 Mar 2015, 8:55 am
Council v. [read post]
2 Jul 2009, 2:09 am
Birmingham City Council v Ali and others; Moran v Manchester City Council (Women's Aid Federation of England and another intervening) [2009] UKHL 36; [2009] WLR (D) 221 “Although it had not been reasonable for families to remain in their current accommodation indefinitely, the local housing authority had been entitled to leave them there in the short [...] [read post]
22 Jan 2009, 2:30 am
Stringer and others v HM Revenue and Customs (Case C-520/06); Schultz-Hoff v Deutsche Rentenversicherung Bund (Case C-350/06); [2009] WLR (D) 13 “Employees who by reason of illness were not able to take paid annual leave in the year in which it was due were not for that reason to be deprived of the right to paid [...] [read post]
25 Nov 2007, 11:52 am
Gregory ValenzaThe Daily Journal2 November 2007REST BREAK AND MEAL PERIOD CLAIMS AFTER MURPHY V. [read post]
14 Dec 2011, 2:12 am
Ziebell v Land Baden-Württemberg (Case C-371/08); [2011] WLR (D) 358 “Protection against expulsion conferred by article 14(1) of EEC-Turkey Association Council Decision No 1/80 did not have the same scope as that conferred on citizens of the Union pursuant to article 28(3)(a) of Parliament and Council Directive 2004/38/EC with the result that the scheme of protection against expulsion enjoyed by the latter could not be applied mutatis mutandis to Turkish nationals for the purpose… [read post]
1 Nov 2011, 3:20 am
Regina (Maxwell) v Office of the Independent Adjudicator for Higher Education [2011] EWCA Civ 1236; [2011] WLR (D) 307 “Although a complaint of disability discrimination was an eligible complaint to be made to the Office of the Independent Adjudicator for Higher Education (“OIA”) under the Higher Education Act 2004, the task and duty of the OIA on a complaint of disability discrimination against a higher education institution was confined to whether the conduct of the… [read post]
22 Mar 2012, 4:00 am
Kennedy v Charity Commission (Information Commissioner and another intervening) [2012] EWCA Civ 317; [2012] WLR (D) 91 “The right to freedom of expression under article 10 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms was not engaged in a case in which the Charity Commission had refused to comply with a journalist’s request that he be supplied with certain information, by applying an absolute exemption which was said to derive from section 32(2)… [read post]
4 Jan 2013, 7:56 am
In September, the Ninth Circuit rendered its opinion in McCormack v. [read post]
5 Mar 2013, 5:19 am
It raises ethics issues in an interesting way as well as gender in the Court and Bush v. [read post]
29 Nov 2016, 6:13 am
In Texas v. [read post]
23 Jan 2014, 2:19 pm
As we discussed yesterday, bipartisan legislation has been introduced in Congress that would amend the Voting Rights Act and recalibrate the coverage formula for preclearance, as a response the the Court's holding in Shelby v. [read post]
24 Jan 2019, 4:21 pm
The RHA is not a simple codification of Roe v. [read post]
8 Apr 2013, 2:53 am
In her column in the NYT last week, Linda Greenhouse wonders whether the federalism argument in the challenge to DOMA in United States v. [read post]
26 Sep 2010, 11:07 am
Perez v. [read post]
8 May 2009, 2:55 am
R (James) v Secretary of State for Justice (Parole Board intervening); R (Lee) v Same (Same intervening); R (Wells) v Same (Same intervening) (on appeal from R (Walker) v Same (Same intervening)) [2009] UKHL 22; [2009] WLR (D) 145 “The failure of the Secretary of State for Justice to provide courses to enable prisoners serving indeterminate [...] [read post]
4 Sep 2006, 6:08 pm
Daily Spivey v. [read post]
