Search for: "Does, A-H" Results 3121 - 3140 of 16,618
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
31 Aug 2018, 12:02 am
Contents include:Special Issue: Experts in the International Adjudicative ProcessLaurence Boisson de Chazournes, Hélène Ruiz Fabri, Makane Moïse Mbengue, Rukmini Das, & Guillaume Gros, The Expert in the International Adjudicative Process: Introduction to the Special Issue Mohamed Bennouna, Experts before the International Court of Justice: What for? [read post]
18 Jul 2021, 2:54 pm by David Oscar Markus
  It also issued this press release.There has been lots of criticism of the Court's opinion, including articles like this one from Above the Law, which concludes like this: "Please tell me what century the Florida Supreme Court is in, because it sure doesn’t look like mine or does it? [read post]
4 Oct 2018, 4:00 am by Howard Friedman
[H]arassing statements and conduct are motivated by an official Church position (or at least the Archdiocese would defend the case on those grounds). [read post]
12 Dec 2013, 7:44 pm
Just because it comes out of a "Special Agent's or detective's mouth does not render it gospel. [read post]
16 Aug 2023, 9:30 pm by ernst
As such, the DLH does not limit itself to traditional formats and offers a platform for innovative research, to reach out to colleagues interested in novel approaches and methodologies.And here is the TOC for the first issue:Book reviewsMax Kemman, Trading Zones of Digital HistoryFemke GordijnJennifer Guiliano, A primer for Teaching Digital History. [read post]
1 Apr 2016, 5:55 am by Timothy P. Flynn
Oral arguments are the opportunity for the lawyers, after filing briefs, to explain their case to the panel of judges.As SCOTUS watchers, we have noted that conservative Justice Clarence Thomas, since his appointment by George H. [read post]
5 Dec 2015, 6:12 am
[H]e amassed one of the greatest fortunes in the world — and is likely never to pay any taxes on it....Maybe Mr. [read post]
12 Feb 2022, 1:23 pm
"Writes Laurence Tribe in "Politicians in Robes/Why does Stephen Breyer continue to insist that the Supreme Court is apolitical? [read post]