Search for: "Does 1-51"
Results 3121 - 3140
of 3,960
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Jun 2023, 9:01 pm
”[43] But section 14(a) does not specifically preempt state corporate law or even specifically mention shareholder proposals. [read post]
24 Dec 2011, 9:25 am
(1-A) Where the Court grants an interim order under sub-section (1), it shall forthwith cause a notice being not less than seven days notice, together with a copy of such order to be served on the Public Prosecutor and the Superintendent of Police, with a view to give the Public Prosecutor a reasonable opportunity of being heard when the application shall be finally heard by the Court. [read post]
20 Jan 2021, 8:49 am
§ 30-3-35.1(1) (LexisNexis 2019). [read post]
19 Sep 2018, 6:00 am
Suppose this company does not have any investment opportunities and so chooses to repurchase 50 shares at $10 each. [read post]
26 May 2021, 2:55 am
Table 1. [read post]
28 Jan 2009, 9:40 am
The following appear to be the leading recent cases: 1. [read post]
9 Apr 2022, 7:01 am
(WIRED, 2020) 1. [read post]
17 Aug 2018, 5:08 am
Does she keep her free NYU apartment, a big deal in New York City? [read post]
19 Oct 2016, 6:27 am
This program needs to ensure that customers on the e-mail list are purged after 6 months if they don’t purchase a product; however, if a customer does complete a purchase, the software must change the purge date to 2 years from the purchase date. [read post]
11 Nov 2020, 9:39 am
It is essential to keep in mind that the civil False Claims Act does not cover mistakes, accidents or mere negligence. [read post]
4 Sep 2024, 9:05 pm
In principle, the CSRD does not require any particular due diligence process. [read post]
30 Nov 2022, 2:13 pm
”[2] The Court in Basic and Halliburton II left unanswered a critical question regarding price impact: how long does it take new, value-relevant information to impact the stock price of a security trading in an efficient market? [read post]
4 Mar 2007, 5:10 am
" White, 401 U.S. at 749-51, 91 S.Ct. at 1125-26, 28 L. [read post]
16 Dec 2006, 5:46 am
Francis of Indiana Cougars (Fort Wayne, 13-0) (1) v. [read post]
29 Jul 2010, 9:48 pm
(General Security),1 and the broadening scope of insurance policy "loss in progress" and "known loss" provisions, House Bill (H.B.) 10-1394, codified at CRS §§ 10-4-110.4 and 13-20-808: (1) provides courts guidance when interpreting liability policies issued to construction professionals; (2) deems property damage resulting from construction defects, including damage to a construction professional’s own work, an "accident," unless the… [read post]
22 Jun 2022, 1:10 pm
Greg Lambert 1:07 Yep. [read post]
29 May 2016, 10:52 am
That is issue 1(b): whether the defendant properly or at all made a “housing needs” assessment prior to making a decision under s.192(3) whether to accommodate the claimant and, of course, although I have not yet reached this issue, prior to providing advice and assistance under s.192(2). [read post]
7 Oct 2013, 12:30 am
Listen from 1:58 to 2:51 as Fred and Bill tell Don Alfonso that the girls' anguished reactions show that he's going to lose the bet, Alfonso tells them it's only the first quarter, and then the boys turn back to the girls into a stunningly beautiful quintet of loss. [read post]
25 Jun 2022, 12:37 pm
51 (2020): 563. [read post]
5 Aug 2020, 4:00 am
The Supreme Court has had the occasion to consider when a contract of adhesion is unconscionable.[1] In doing so the Court asserts its ability to apply equitable considerations in cases of unconscionable contracts and should bring caution to the minds of all contract drafters so that their terms are communicated better and onerous terms or outcomes are brought to the attention of the vulnerable party. [read post]
