Search for: "Driver v. State" Results 3121 - 3140 of 10,224
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Oct 2011, 10:53 am
Similar to the majority of other states in the country, California law has a rule called "implied consent" (under V C Section 23612). [read post]
21 Apr 2016, 12:51 pm by CJLF Staff
  CJLF filed an amicus brief in one of the North Dakota cases, Beylund v. [read post]
21 Sep 2012, 5:47 am by Susan Brenner
  These two counts charged Laiwala with violating California Penal Code § 115(a), which provides as follows:Every person who knowingly procures or offers any false or forged instrument to be filed, registered, or recorded in any public office within this state, which instrument, if genuine, might be filed, registered, or recorded under any law of this state or of the United States, is guilty of a felony.People v. [read post]
  Both parties and the court agreed that California Retail Liquor Dealers Assoc. v. [read post]
29 Sep 2010, 5:54 am by Steven M. Gursten
ICLE 2010 download No. 5 for auto accident attorneys, from State Bar of Michigan seminar in Grand Rapids on helping lawyers find the value in auto accident cases Take a look at the supporting motion used in Steve Gursten’s Grand Rapids presentation, “Representing Injured Personal Injury Victims and Finding Value in Car Accident Claims After McCormick v. [read post]
16 Nov 2010, 11:22 am
In State v Green, the Appellate Division held that the the Stalker Lidar speed measurement device has not yet shown to be scientifically reliable. [read post]
19 Oct 2010, 3:52 am
Martin unfit for such employment following a post-appointment investigation where “undisputed evidence” showed that Martin had falsified his employment application “to conceal his using a social security number not his own to obtain a second New York State drivers’ license after his first license had been revoked. [read post]
20 Jan 2007, 8:20 am
Nathan Webb and Washburn student intern William Drexler won in State v. [read post]
22 May 2012, 8:27 am by Lawrence Taylor
In Bell v Burson (402 U.S. 535) the Court acknowledged that the right to drive is a privilege. [read post]