Search for: "ENGLISH v. STATE"
Results 3121 - 3140
of 7,358
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 May 2016, 2:45 am
It is perhaps surprising to see a UKIP MEP seeking to rely on European Law to stay an English libel action. [read post]
16 May 2016, 5:23 pm
For the reasons stated in Judge Manion’s partial dissent, 799 F. [read post]
16 May 2016, 2:03 pm
This morning, the Supreme Court of the United States issued its decision in Robins v. [read post]
16 May 2016, 11:35 am
(Justice White went on to get his majority in the case, Babbitt v. [read post]
15 May 2016, 10:44 pm
A defendant in a New Jersey DWI case, State v. [read post]
15 May 2016, 4:00 am
https://t.co/GzwN0Nt45P -> Link to Maltz v. [read post]
14 May 2016, 1:01 am
On this day in history, Lord Mansfield of the King’s Bench in England issued a ruling in the case of Somerset v. [read post]
13 May 2016, 4:27 pm
The court stated that, on the facts outlined above, the “basic elements of a good, strong harassment claim [in English law] are present“. [read post]
12 May 2016, 12:25 pm
Supap Kirtsaeng, a Thai citizen who came to the United States in 1997 to study mathematics, asked friends and family in Thailand to buy the English-language versions of his textbooks in Thailand, where they were cheaper and mail them to him. [read post]
12 May 2016, 2:00 am
He stated that the question to be answered was whether CPA Order 17, which was no doubt procedurally binding in Iraq, operated as an impediment rendering it impossible for the plaintiff to claim his right, under art 435, where the English courts were concerned. [read post]
10 May 2016, 11:20 am
In EEOC v. [read post]
10 May 2016, 7:56 am
He stated that “In a case like the present, the parties have made their own law by contracting, and can in principle un-make or re-make it”. [read post]
10 May 2016, 6:53 am
Accordingly, the court denied summary judgment against the EEOC’s race and/or national origin discrimination claims (EEOC v. [read post]
9 May 2016, 10:44 pm
The Appellate Division rejected this argument in late April 2016 in State v. [read post]
9 May 2016, 2:16 pm
In the Article 8 defence English case law, the Supreme Court seemed pretty clear on the point, at least as a ‘general rule’, at para 61 of Manchester City Council v Pinnock [2011] 2 AC 104. [read post]
5 May 2016, 5:05 am
The glyphs used in Klingon are functional, and analogous to typeface designs (which are said in US law to be protectable as industrial designs only, per Adobe Sys. v. [read post]
4 May 2016, 7:42 am
The US Supreme Court has agreed to hear Star Athletica, LLC v. [read post]
3 May 2016, 10:41 am
For all that reform of our defamation law is undoubtedly necessary, we must not over-state the problems. [read post]
