Search for: "Ex parte Long"
Results 3121 - 3140
of 5,734
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Aug 2014, 8:21 am
This one, in particular, has long rubbed me the wrong way. [read post]
13 Aug 2014, 9:00 am
These actions may be negligent (ex. if a failure to inspect parts of an aging system leads to a leak) or distressingly intentional (ex. if a company opts not to report a sewage release for fear of negative press or economic consequences and people are sickened because they are unaware that water is tainted). [read post]
13 Aug 2014, 6:45 am
It is not the purpose of an ex parte injunction to stall the proceedings so that the Applicant’s opponents fade away without being heard in court. [read post]
Innovation & Law: The Practice of Law Has Changed Over the Past 10 Years – BigLaw Shifts to SmallLaw
11 Aug 2014, 4:46 pm
August 11, 2014 I’ve been practicing law now – for the most part competition, advertising and regulatory law – for the past 12 years or so. [read post]
7 Aug 2014, 7:05 am
Are these not also part of our history? [read post]
7 Aug 2014, 2:09 am
It's an ex tempore 24 July decision of Mr Justice Norris in the Patents Court, England and Wales, which this Kat found on the Lawtel subscription-only service. [read post]
5 Aug 2014, 1:19 pm
One week later, the government wrote a letter to Judge White, submitting it ex parte (which means we didn't get a copy), requesting that it be given the chance to review the written transcript of that hearing before the transcript was provided either to plaintiffs or the public. [read post]
5 Aug 2014, 12:52 pm
A Long Island Family Lawyer said that, the respondent raises three defenses to this proceeding. [read post]
5 Aug 2014, 12:20 am
As I see it, the theory behind ex parte court orders is that Congress (or, in constitutional cases, the Fourth Amendment) requires a judicial check before the surveillance occurs. [read post]
1 Aug 2014, 12:56 am
Fair enough, as long as they have enough people in the team to do investigations, expulsions and appeals. [read post]
31 Jul 2014, 6:41 pm
Each side is independently obliged to follow the rules of war regardless of the other side’s behavior, but believing that over the long run “independent” legal obligations will prevail when the “reciprocity” of legal obligations fails is, in my view, unlikely to remain stable over the long run. [read post]
31 Jul 2014, 1:12 pm
Given the peculiarly long latency period for the peculiar injury – suffered in utero − in DES cases, product identification was a mess. [read post]
29 Jul 2014, 10:00 am
If the judgment reserves the issue how much you and your ex should be paying, and you think your ex should be paying more than he or she is, the right time to file a petition with the court is probably right now. [read post]
28 Jul 2014, 5:07 pm
In an earlier appeal, we reversed in part on the ground that the system claims were invalid and that two of the asserted method claims were not infringed. [read post]
22 Jul 2014, 7:19 am
It cannot be held back, Parliament has decreed that the Treaty is henceforward to be part of our law. [read post]
22 Jul 2014, 5:06 am
Seriously, look for more long write-ups soon. [read post]
15 Jul 2014, 7:57 pm
A New York Criminal Lawyer said in an effort to seize alleged drug proceeds in the defendant's name and in the name of his ex-wife, the People initiated forfeiture proceedings under Title 21 United States Code 881. [read post]
15 Jul 2014, 9:00 am
I tried to impress on our German hosts that their alarm over American policy is partially fueled by the mistaken assumption that the robust constitutional privacy protection they seem to enjoy under the Basic Law is part of a common constitutional heritage that should manifest itself in American constitutional law with an equivalent commitment to privacy. [read post]
14 Jul 2014, 4:45 pm
And because the 9/11 conspiracy took place long before 2006, the statute could accomplish its explicit purpose only if it applied to preenactment conduct. [read post]
14 Jul 2014, 7:29 am
I am thumbing through the long-awaited and seemingly split ruling, which opens as follows: Opinion for the court filed by Circuit Judge HENDERSON. [read post]
