Search for: "Harris v. Does"
Results 3121 - 3140
of 3,599
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Sep 2021, 12:00 pm
Drawing on the landmark 1819 case of McCulloch v. [read post]
29 Jun 2014, 9:01 pm
In other words, a legislative measure that does not “change the scope or effect” of a previously enacted initiative cannot be said to amend or repeal the initiative, and does not require voter approval. [read post]
30 Jul 2024, 9:01 pm
In blue New York State, where I live and work, since even before the Supreme Court’s 1973 decision in Roe v. [read post]
15 Feb 2017, 12:44 pm
While the law facially allows prosecution for mere gross negligence, in reality it does seem to require some degree of intent. [read post]
2 Jan 2015, 4:45 am
So this has nothing do with cases like Baker v. [read post]
9 Mar 2018, 5:52 am
Harris Funeral Homes, Inc., March 7, 2018, Moore, K.). [read post]
22 Sep 2020, 4:17 pm
Sanchez v. [read post]
31 Jan 2023, 9:31 am
Harris Methodist Forth Worth v. [read post]
1 Jul 2020, 9:01 pm
As the Court put it four years ago in Fisher v. [read post]
4 Jan 2016, 12:31 pm
A majority of the Justices joined in the critique, most strongly expressed in 2014 in Harris v. [read post]
30 Nov 2010, 11:06 am
V. [read post]
5 Sep 2008, 11:01 pm
& Ors v Deisel Spa and Case C-302/08 Zino Davidoff SA v Bendesfinanzdirektion Sudost: (Class 46), EPO Boards of Appeal finds that when a fax is transmitted and an ‘OK’ is noted by the sender, this is evidence that the transmission was successful: (IPKat), Professor Hugenholtz slams European Commission for ignoring evidence on copyright extension: (Techdirt) Germany Federal Patent Court publishes guidelines on colour trade mark Signal Yellow:… [read post]
7 Jan 2016, 1:33 pm
See Oachs v. [read post]
27 Jan 2024, 7:54 pm
[This post is co-authored with Professor Seth Barrett Tillman] On January 18, Professor Akhil Reed Amar and Professor Vikram Amar filed an amicus brief in Trump v. [read post]
4 Jun 2014, 7:42 am
” Leahy emphasized recent rulings in Citizens United v. [read post]
16 Jul 2020, 8:10 am
The government referenced Vasquez v. [read post]
5 Mar 2012, 2:00 am
v=NsJHqstPuNo UPDATE: Governor Branstad signed the bill into law. [read post]
26 Jul 2012, 12:54 pm
For example, in Nichols v. [read post]
21 May 2024, 5:55 am
Nevertheless, the AI Office’s role does not imply to verify or proceed to “a work-by-work assessment of the training data in terms of copyright compliance. [read post]
24 Apr 2017, 8:33 am
The Supreme Court justices in the Youngstown steel seizure case faced the question of the emergency authority of the President of the United States, not of the person of Harry S. [read post]
