Search for: "Harris v. Does"
Results 3121 - 3140
of 3,599
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Dec 2009, 6:04 am
Harris, 35 A.D.3d 1197 [4th Dept. 2006]; People v. [read post]
5 Dec 2009, 4:39 pm
(SeeMorris v. [read post]
5 Dec 2009, 1:46 pm
In other words, in such circumstances theapplicant would only be receiving what he or she was entitled to receive whenthe power was exhausted.The legislation does not prescribe what the FullCourt in Zschokke at 83,218 described as “preconditions” and nor would we seekto exhaustively prescribe matters that may be relevant to take into account inthe exercise of the discretion under s80(1)(h) of the Act. [read post]
5 Dec 2009, 9:43 am
Harris, 324 F.3d 602, 606 (8th Cir. 2003); United States v. [read post]
3 Dec 2009, 5:33 am
Doe, 518 U.S. 1014, 116 S.Ct. 2543, 135 L.Ed.2d 1064 (1996); see also Harris v. [read post]
1 Dec 2009, 12:52 pm
United States v. [read post]
November 30, 2009 – Environmental Law Settlements, Decisions, Regulatory Actions and Lawsuit Filings
30 Nov 2009, 9:25 am
Click Here California Appeals Court Affirms Lower Court Holding in Goodrich v. [read post]
29 Nov 2009, 8:13 pm
A recent example of why such self-prepared agreements are problematic was illustrated in a recent case, Scully v. [read post]
21 Nov 2009, 2:43 am
Pottawattamie County v. [read post]
20 Nov 2009, 11:43 pm
[Jackson v. [read post]
16 Nov 2009, 4:00 am
Now that Jones v. [read post]
13 Nov 2009, 2:52 pm
People v. [read post]
11 Nov 2009, 8:10 am
† The editorial notes that not only does the land at issue in the Court’s 2005 case Kelo v. [read post]
10 Nov 2009, 12:39 pm
Following the Conglomerate's excellent forum on Jones v. [read post]
10 Nov 2009, 9:12 am
 Further, Harris does not save the Michigan scheme because Michigan's mandatory guidelines regularly raise the ceiling on judges' discretion, not just the floor. [read post]
8 Nov 2009, 7:44 pm
' Court of Appeal rules... - Scopelight Ltd & Ors v Chief Constable of Northumbria and Federation Against Copyright Theft concerning police powers to retain seized property once decision not prosecute has been made (1709 Copyright Blog) Warner Bros says Harry Potter theme dinner infringes copyright (TorrentFreak) United States US General Did you know... section 337 settlement agreements must be approved by the ITC? [read post]
8 Nov 2009, 7:44 pm
– Scopelight Ltd & Ors v Chief Constable of Northumbria and Federation Against Copyright Theft concerning police powers to retain seized property once decision not prosecute has been made (1709 Copyright Blog) Warner Bros says Harry Potter theme dinner infringes copyright (TorrentFreak) United States US General Did you know... section 337 settlement agreements must be approved by the ITC? [read post]
8 Nov 2009, 7:44 pm
– Scopelight Ltd & Ors v Chief Constable of Northumbria and Federation Against Copyright Theft concerning police powers to retain seized property once decision not prosecute has been made (1709 Copyright Blog) Warner Bros says Harry Potter theme dinner infringes copyright (TorrentFreak) United States US General Did you know... section 337 settlement agreements must be approved by the ITC? [read post]
6 Nov 2009, 5:40 pm
Florida, being argued at 10, and Sullivan v. [read post]
