Search for: "His Law v. USA" Results 3121 - 3140 of 3,297
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
31 Mar 2008, 11:41 pm
Having previously analyzed section (a) of the judicial ethics law dealing with the appearance of partiality, he wrote in 1988 in Liljeberg v. [read post]
26 Mar 2008, 6:33 am
Justice Breyer's dissent in Medellin v. [read post]
18 Mar 2008, 1:29 pm
"[5] In its recent decision on punitive damages, Philip Morris USA v. [read post]
17 Mar 2008, 5:48 am
Al Arian would only admit having helped his brother-in-law with immigration matters, and not telling a reporter about a colleague's political associations, both of which were true, and neither of which were crimes, the Bush-administration would agree call the legal, non-violent acts evidence of a "conspiracy," and recommend his release by the end of May 2006. [read post]
12 Mar 2008, 11:58 am
Norris v USA: judgment in full "He described the obstruction charge as "subsidiary" to the price-fixing charge that the law lords ruled was not an extraditable offence. [read post]
11 Mar 2008, 1:00 am
  Might sound silly to you, but I thought Zach was a good blogger, I had respect for him because of it and I still do.So in reading Zach Scruggs' reply brief yesterday in USA v. [read post]
7 Mar 2008, 1:40 pm
The law previously governing this situation should be restored until Congress can correct its mistake and fill in the gap. 08a0102p.06 USA v. [read post]
7 Mar 2008, 1:27 pm
For the reasons set forth below, we AFFIRM the judgment of the district court. 08a0090p.06 USA v. [read post]
5 Mar 2008, 8:59 am
On March 5, 2008 in USA v Deverso, the Eleventh Circuit did not find any error in the admission of an unsigned foreign birth certificate. [read post]
29 Feb 2008, 10:28 pm
The Military CommissionsIn the case of USA v Omar Khadr, the defense recently had several pre-trial motions denied by military judge Peter Brownback. [read post]
27 Feb 2008, 7:18 am
  But even with that case, some presume he must have had some grand, sophisticated insight into the law, and that his non-compliance was either legally permissible or not worth bothering such a figure about.This reasoning is a mystery to me for a couple reasons. [read post]
27 Feb 2008, 12:11 am
I read the latest filing by the special prosecutors in USA v. [read post]