Search for: "In Re: CONTEMPT"
Results 3121 - 3140
of 3,254
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Jan 2011, 1:19 pm
There are many dusty corners of the FPR which many practitioners will not have had cause to peer into regularly – this is an opportunity to (re)familiarize yourself with those aspects of the rules observed mainly in their breach or which are well known as to content but not as to source (who can tell me the rule number which bars the filling of evidence in section 8 applications except by specific direction of the court?). [read post]
25 Jul 2016, 2:05 am
The revenge pornography law does not currently treat the offence as a sexual crime and victims face being re-victimised if a suspect is arrested and charged, say campaigners. [read post]
6 Feb 2024, 2:54 pm
I'm going to give you one more chance to address the various penalties I might impose before I'm concluding that you're not going to respond to your opportunity to be heard. [read post]
23 Jan 2007, 4:01 pm
But had the judge deemed any defense action a violation of the gag order, the judge could have held them in contempt of court. [read post]
17 Jul 2021, 4:08 pm
We don’t care what you say, we don’t care what the evidence is, we’re right. [read post]
8 Aug 2019, 6:31 am
The defendant subsequently moved, inter alia, to hold the plaintiff in civil contempt for failure to comply with the judgment of divorce. [read post]
12 Apr 2019, 2:35 pm
.; In re, 19 CBN 870 (Bankr. [read post]
9 Apr 2007, 11:58 am
Failure to pay ordered alimony can result in contempt of court citations and even jail time. [read post]
3 Jun 2016, 6:13 am
Paleteria La Michoacana, Inc. v. [read post]
27 Dec 2014, 2:19 am
So, blocking orders: fine so long as they're reasonable! [read post]
6 Feb 2020, 9:01 pm
You’re messing with our interests. [read post]
16 May 2017, 6:28 pm
In short, we’re concerned that forums, jurors, clients or potential clients, or members of the public might believe that people who call themselves “Judge” are more fair, honest, disinterested, knowledgeable, credible, or influential in ways that are misleading to the public or unfair to other lawyers or other individuals in public life. [read post]
21 Oct 2014, 10:42 am
The Providence Journal reported on this interesting case in late July (and on several occasions before then), but I’ve only now gotten the judge’s opinion, which I thought I’d post. [read post]
10 Oct 2022, 5:01 am
Attorneys have effectively further re-delegated the authority to issue Civil Investigative Demands to the Assistant U.S. [read post]
23 Aug 2008, 1:23 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Thinktank Global week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com] Highlights this week included: DRM for streaming music dies a quiet death: (Electronic Frontier Foundation), (Techdirt) CAFC decides Apotex and Impax infringed AstraZeneca’s Prilosec patents: (Law360), (Patent Prospector), (Patent Docs), (GenericsWeb), CAFC upholds lower court’s decision finding USPTO was within its rights to subject a Cooper patent to… [read post]
23 Jun 2008, 8:39 am
Source: New York Legislative Retrieval System (LRS), Search run June 22, 2008. [read post]
10 May 2023, 4:00 am
It’s also grim to see journalists make decisions about their own coverage based on outdated ideas of the laws of defamation and contempt of court. [read post]
26 Nov 2019, 9:00 pm
Bolton had a well-documented history of contempt for the UN—including a past statement that “the [UN] Secretariat Building in New York has 38 stories. [read post]
2 Jul 2018, 6:00 am
This is one of the most frequent and difficult problems I run into - calls from people who are shocked to see their paycheck reduced by a wage garnishment or who are suddenly bouncing checks and getting hit with overdraft fees for debits and failed payment fees because their bank accounts were garnished ...This problem is why you should NEVER ignore a demand letter or a lawsuit -- the problem you cause yourself when you do is always exponentially larger and more expensive to solve than the one you… [read post]
1 Sep 2023, 4:00 am
Judge Says Peter Navarro Can’t Use Privilege as Defense in Contempt Case MSN – Paul Duggan (Washington Post) | Published: 8/30/2023 A judge ruled Peter Navarro, a Trump White House adviser charged with criminal contempt of Congress, cannot argue to a jury that he was barred by executive privilege from providing testimony and documents to the House committee investigating the attack on the U.S. [read post]
