Search for: "In re A. V."
Results 3121 - 3140
of 62,913
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 May 2023, 5:27 am
Supreme Court case of Davis v. [read post]
30 May 2023, 12:29 am
The decision in R (on the application of Fox) v Secretary of State for Education [2015] EWHC 3404 (Admin) concerned the new subject content issued for GCSE Religious Studies. [read post]
29 May 2023, 11:00 pm
A defendant must have aided and abetted (by knowingly providing substantial assistance) another person in the commission of the 4 TWITTER, INC. v. [read post]
29 May 2023, 6:20 pm
For example, the Third Circuit is poised to decide the Range v. [read post]
29 May 2023, 2:40 pm
“When we perform our investigations, we’re really looking for a common source or exposure point,” she said. [read post]
29 May 2023, 11:43 am
These provisions, placed today in Chapter V of the UPCA, include the definition of the patent’s owner prerogatives to prevent the direct and indirect use of the invention (Art. 25 and 26), the list of limitations concerning the scope of patent protection, including inter alia, acts done privately or for experimental purposes, the use of biological material for the purpose of breeding, discovering and developing other plant varieties (Art. 27), the condition of the right for prior use… [read post]
29 May 2023, 9:03 am
On 26 May 2023 the managing judge, Fancourt J, handed down judgment in the case of Grant v News Group Newspapers Ltd (Re Mobile Telephone Voicemail Interception Ligitation) [2023] EWHC 1273 (Ch) The judge dismissed the Sun’s application for summary judgment in relation to illegal information gathering but allowed the application in relation to the phone hacking parts of the claim on “limitation” grounds. [read post]
28 May 2023, 4:46 pm
” Kagan v. [read post]
28 May 2023, 10:20 am
In re Wellman-Ally, 2023 VT 28 (mem.) [read post]
28 May 2023, 4:00 am
Criminal Law: DelayR. v. [read post]
28 May 2023, 3:59 am
À l’issue d’un second procès, le juge est libre de déterminer la peine appropriée, mais il ne peut imposer une peine plus sévère que celle infligée lors du premier procès en l’absence de nouveaux faits qui le justifient, et ce, de façon convaincante. [read post]
27 May 2023, 12:23 pm
Optis v. [read post]
27 May 2023, 11:05 am
” People v. [read post]
27 May 2023, 10:44 am
Precedents like Train v. [read post]
26 May 2023, 2:23 pm
A critical case absent from the Supreme Court’s Amgen analysis is In re Wands, 858 F.2d 731 (Fed. [read post]
26 May 2023, 1:14 pm
Furthermore, by that point, the children will be re-acclimated to life in Germany and to the care of Petitioner. [read post]
26 May 2023, 1:05 pm
Alvarez, 697 F.3d 41, 53 (2d Cir. 2012) and In re B. [read post]
26 May 2023, 1:02 pm
” Ermini v. [read post]
26 May 2023, 1:01 pm
” In re B.A.S., 2022 WL 16936205, at *1. [read post]
26 May 2023, 1:00 pm
In Royal Borough of Kensington and Chelsea v Bafna-Louis, 2023 WL 2387385 (S.D.N.Y., 2023) the Royal Borough of Kensington and Chelsea (the “RBKC”) brought a petition for the return of CBL and Baby L to the United Kingdom pursuant to the Hague Convention. [read post]
