Search for: "Insurance Provider 2" Results 3121 - 3140 of 25,917
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Apr 2013, 7:28 am by Mark S. Humphreys
This means the insurance company has no duty to provide benefits under the policy until this co-operation has been given. [read post]
19 Apr 2012, 7:21 pm
Section 64-VB of the Insurance Act, 1938 (for short, ‘Insurance Act’) provides as under: “64-VB. [read post]
28 Jan 2020, 1:38 pm by Cynthia Marcotte Stamer
Her public policy and regulatory affairs experience encompasses advising and representing domestic and multinational private sector health, insurance, employee benefit, employer, staffing and other outsourced service providers, and other clients in dealings with Congress, state legislatures, and federal, state and local regulators and government entities, as well as providing advice and input to U.S. and foreign government leaders on these and other policy concerns. [read post]
18 Nov 2010, 7:06 am
"Your work" performed for that insured at the location designated in the contract, agreement or permit; or 2. [read post]
29 Jan 2020, 2:00 am by Bridget Miller, Contributing Editor
The post Unequal Benefits Part 2: Ways to Combat the Issue appeared first on HR Daily Advisor. [read post]
18 Nov 2015, 11:02 am
”  Defendant filed for declaratory judgment against Insured, Plaintiffs, and Driver seeking a determination of whether the Insured’s umbrella policy provided coverage for Driver’s negligence. [read post]
23 Jun 2011, 3:12 pm by Stanley D. Baum
As to section 502(a)(2) of ERISA (which generally allows a plan participant to sue for breach of fiduciary duty), under case law, that section allows an action on behalf of the plan, and does not provide for individual relief. [read post]
9 Jul 2018, 7:40 pm
[i]nvolving a single act or series of acts . . . is considered one occurrence" under the policy.The policy also contained what the motion court characterized as "robust anti-stacking language", which provided:If any loss is covered: (1) Partly by this insurance; and (2) Partly by any prior cancellation or terminated insurance that we or any affiliate had issued to you or any predecessor in interest; the most we will pay is the larger of the amount… [read post]
9 Aug 2011, 7:55 am by Mark S. Humphreys
The liability issues in this case fell into two categories: (1) whether State Farm established arson and misrepresentation and (2) whether the Polasek's established that State Farm denied their insurance claim in bad faith. [read post]
9 May 2010, 7:02 am by Darrin Mish
Implications of Health Insurance Enforcement on IRS pt 2 is a post from: IRS Tax Problem Solver Blog - IRS Help [read post]
26 Oct 2015, 10:29 am by John S. Moffa
The benefits provided under PIP are called no-fault insurance coverage, meaning that you have a right to make a claim with your insurer to receive PIP benefits after you have been involved in an accident, whether or not you were at fault. [read post]
17 Feb 2010, 2:20 pm by Curran Tomko Tarski LLP
Other Health Plan Updates Also Required The HIPAA Privacy Rule changes effective today are only part of the ever-growing list of federal mandates that group health plan sponsors, fiduciaries, insurers, administrators and service providers need to be concerned about. [read post]
20 Sep 2021, 11:30 am by Neumann Law Group
The new insurance laws cap coverage at $250,000 for claims commencing July 2, 2020. [read post]
23 Feb 2012, 10:32 am by Diane Polscer
With respect to the fortuity doctrine, Oregon courts generally recognize that there is a public policy against providing insurance for intentionally inflicted injury. [read post]
25 Dec 2012, 8:49 am by Mark S. Humphreys
Statutes dealing with this can be found at TIC, Sections 541.002(2), 541.151, 544.051(6), and 544.052. 5) an insurance contract entered into by an unauthorized insurer is unenforceable by the insurer. [read post]
15 Oct 2020, 2:00 am by HR Daily Advisor Content Team
“The Treasury Department and the IRS have determined that a substantial number of employers, insurers, and other providers of minimum essential coverage need additional time beyond the January 31, 2021, due date to gather and analyze the information and prepare the 2020 Forms 1095-B and 1095-C to be furnished to individuals,” the IRS explained in the October 2 notice. [read post]
12 Aug 2010, 7:40 am
  The reason is that in those cases the insured released the culpable party, whereas the insured in this case did not provide such a release to the culpable party, and the claim for subrogation remains viable as to the dishonest employee, Fishman. [read post]