Search for: "MATTER OF B P B P" Results 3121 - 3140 of 5,344
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Aug 2012, 7:36 am by rlargent@cdflaborlaw.com
  The issue in the case was whether the non-compete in the employment agreement was enforceable under B&P Code section 16601’s allowance of non-compete agreements connected to the sale of a business. [read post]
25 Mar 2020, 11:14 am by The Law Offices of John Day, P.C.
P. 12.02(2) motion to dismiss for lack of personal jurisdiction. [read post]
24 Mar 2010, 9:00 am by Lucas A. Ferrara, Esq.
The Attorney General's Office notified Crosby and its principals, Reed Elson, Frank P. [read post]
15 Nov 2010, 11:31 am by Brad Wendel
P. 11 (and state counterparts) that aim directly at frivolous litigation. [read post]
10 Aug 2011, 4:00 am by Ted Folkman
P. 45(b)(2)(C), or service on a national or resident of the United States abroad under 28 U.S.C. [read post]
16 May 2007, 12:58 pm
Justices Nares, Haller, and O'Rourke were scheduled to hear the matter, but the court vacated the oral argument, sua sponte, and will reschedule it in due course. [read post]
5 Sep 2012, 10:30 am by Katherine Gallo
I think my conduct at the depo (agreeing to withdraw all my instructions not to answer and to deal with the questions right there on the spot) was substantially justified in opposing the motion too (because at least some of his points were at least arguably wrong as a matter of law, and also because of his complete failure to try to meet and confer before filing the motion, in violation of sec 2023.010(I) (pdf), sec 2025.480(b), among other reasons. [read post]
10 Aug 2011, 4:00 am by Ted Folkman
P. 45(b)(2)(C), or service on a national or resident of the United States abroad under 28 U.S.C. [read post]
17 Jul 2008, 5:28 pm
("Big C") for debts incurred by Joseph Saviano d/b/a Classic Builders. [read post]
2 May 2011, 5:45 pm by FDABlog HPM
§ 514.235(b) permit a direct appeal to an appellate court within 60 days after the entry of a relevant  FDA order.) [read post]
13 Mar 2019, 4:00 am by Administrator
” In the context of property loss matters, where a purchaser believes it had purchased a home free of defects, “the fairest measure of damages is that which would provide the [plaintiffs] with what they bargained for – a home free of defects. [read post]